Welcome to The Simple Dollar! If this is your first time visiting the site, read my story and my key simple ideas for improving your finances and your life. Also, don't miss my free plan for improving your finances in 31 days.
Next Post: The 9 Steps To Financial Freedom: Steps 4-6
25 Rules to Grow Rich By #3: Buying a Home 9comments
The Simple Dollar is running a series in which we re-evaluate Money Magazine’s “25 Rules To Grow Rich By”. One “rule” will be re-evaluated each weekday until the series concludes; you can keep tabs on the action at the 25 Rules index.
Rule #3: Spend no more than two and a half times your income on a home. For a down payment, it’s best to come up with at least 20%.
This rule is a fine one if you have little or no outstanding debt. However, many modern first time home buyers are often straddling a debt load equal to as much as a year’s income just from education, and thus using this rule of thumb can quickly put people into a frightening danger zone.
The reason is simple: once you reach a level where you have more than two and a half times your annual salary in debt, your payments on that debt will be pushing 40% or more of your take home salary. If you figure that you’ll be paying 25% of your salary in taxes (income, sales, etc.), that means you’re left with only 35% of your annual salary for all of your needs and all of your savings. Even if you cut back to saving only 5% of your annual income (which is itself a danger), you’re going to only have 30% of your annual income to live on, which is also a flag-raiser. If you’d like to do some calculations along these lines, use Smart Money’s debt calculator.
The threshold of a 20% down payment is pretty clear, especially if you’re already holding significant debt. The additional cost of having less than a 20% down payment, which means high interest rates on an ARM or paying PMI along with the extra debt burden, will put you in a very precarious financial situation.
However, if you have more than 20% you can use for a down payment, you don’t necessarily want to dump all of it into the down payment. If you are confidently able to exceed your mortgage interest rate in other investments – and there are a lot of investments out there that can beat the 6-7% threshold – you should strongly consider investing the remaining money after you have the 20% down payment. Plus, if you were to run into financial problems at a later date, you can access that extra money without tapping into your home or refinancing your mortgage.
In short, this rule makes sense if you’re a timid investor or if you have a lot of money in the bank, but if either of these statements exclude you, it’s time to rewrite that rule:
Rewritten Rule #3: Go no more than two and a half times your income in overall debt to buy a home. For a down payment, only exceed 20% if you don’t think you can beat the interest rate in investments.
You can jump ahead to rule #4 or jump back to rule #2.
BTW, the Money Magazine Rule #3 stated spending no more than 2½ instead of 2 times your income on a home.
One thing that I don’t like about this rule is that it makes home ownership only available to high income earners where I live. I
mentioned this in my blog, since I found it surprising that it would require an income of $144,000 per year to buy a median priced home in Massachusetts. Scary stuff…
Exactly. You should never find yourself more than double your annual income in overall debt. So, if you bring in $100,000 and have $20,000 in debt, you should not buy a house costing more than $180,000.
Trent — even after MoneyFwd pointed it out, you made no admission that you misstated Money’s rule — spend no more than 2 AND A HALF times your income on a home.
Actually, I think both rules are oversimplifications because they don’t take interest rates into account, and you don’t take into account the KIND of other debt a person might have, and at what interest rate. You rule seems to forbid the use of student loans, by the way — by the time I sat down to my first college class, I had taken out a loan that was more than double my annual income. I sure hope nobody out there is taking this rule literally.
One obvious implication: Leave California!
The first part of the rule seems pretty sound, although, as Jeff noted, there are different kinds of debt; someone with $20,000 in debt at 4% is in a much better position to take on an $80,000 mortgage than someone with the same amount of debt at 18%, even if they make the same amount of income.
As for putting 20% down on a mortgage if possible (and no more), that seems pretty sound.
I wonder if you think investing anything over 20% rather than increasing your down payment is still sound advice?
Here in the UK a >20% deposit is becoming the only way to unlock the good mortgage rates. If the difference between 20% down and 30% down is a 5% rate reduction (resulting in significantly lower monthly payments), I posit you’re better off making the 30%.
If 30% and 40% saves you a further 2%, then it would make sense to make the 30% and invest the difference. A 2% return is not difficult even in our current economic climate. 5% is possible with care but the 7% would be unattainable here right now without real prolonged luck.
This sounds like a nice rule, but completely unrealistic where I live. Using this rule, assuming an annual income of $100K/yr, a 20% down and a total mortgage of $250K, you’d be able to purchase at best a 1-BR condo, which wouldn’t be a realistic living situation for an average family of 4.
Leave a reply

My new book, The Simple Dollar: How One Man Wiped Out His Debts and Achieved the Life of His Dreams, is available in bookstores now! Check out some of the 







Are you saying don’t allow your debt (all loans plus mortgage) exceed twice your take income?
So if you make $100k a year, have $20k in debt, don’t buy a house worth more than $180k (after downpayment). Are you assuming that your savings (like downpayment amount over the 20%) offsets the total mortgage and loan amounts?