<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wal-Mart Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/</link>
	<description>Simple, applicable personal finance advice for the modern world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:55:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maynard Altizer</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-574720</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard Altizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-574720</guid>
		<description>My friend, what you need is the DVD &quot;High Cost for Low Prices&quot;. In case you have not seen it, it gives you the picture of Wally World from the inside and how the top management really works and thinks of the people that work there.  Also, the greed of the Walton family is sick, sick, sick. What is their goal? To have and KEEP as much money as they can regardless of what the people that work for them go through to get them there.  I would like to think that if Sam Walton was still alive, he would disown the entire bunch and get rid of Lee Scott for all the lies and the underhand way that he runs the company.  At least, that is what I would hope he would do.  It&#039;s not just that they have ruined so many small businesses, lied to the cities and counties that have given them money to locate there, destroyed school system and others that were not connected to the retail business. You really need to purchase the DVD.  Maynard Altizer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend, what you need is the DVD &#8220;High Cost for Low Prices&#8221;. In case you have not seen it, it gives you the picture of Wally World from the inside and how the top management really works and thinks of the people that work there.  Also, the greed of the Walton family is sick, sick, sick. What is their goal? To have and KEEP as much money as they can regardless of what the people that work for them go through to get them there.  I would like to think that if Sam Walton was still alive, he would disown the entire bunch and get rid of Lee Scott for all the lies and the underhand way that he runs the company.  At least, that is what I would hope he would do.  It&#8217;s not just that they have ruined so many small businesses, lied to the cities and counties that have given them money to locate there, destroyed school system and others that were not connected to the retail business. You really need to purchase the DVD.  Maynard Altizer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-162291</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-162291</guid>
		<description>Oh my god, this is the best website on Wal-Mart. I got all the facts I really needed right here. Now, I can present a good debate based on these facts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god, this is the best website on Wal-Mart. I got all the facts I really needed right here. Now, I can present a good debate based on these facts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-40492</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-40492</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about Supply and Demand, do you know that for every one Wallmart worker, there are 3 lined up waiting to replace him ?

If Wallmart didn&#039;t provide these jobs, there would be thousands of more people lining up for Food Stamps, and it&#039;ll be you and I who will be paying for that.

No one cares about the oppertunities that Wallmart provides for these unkilled labors, nor the saving provided (Not for every single product of course).

Everyone wants to cry about how these Wallmart workers are treated unfairly, but the fact is that if these workers don&#039;t like the conditions provided, they can always quit and work somewhere else.  These people choose to work at Wallmart, choose to work for minimal salary and no benefits, because they don&#039;t have a lot of other options. 

This is the same for people complainting about Sweat Shops in foreign countries, they don&#039;t understand that working in the sweat shop for these kids help put food on the table for those families, help put clothes on family members.  Yes, the condition is bad, but it&#039;s not like they have oppertunities like us in America.

To make this short, Wallmart works, Wallmart provide jobs for people, provides variety of products for people.  If you don&#039;t like how they treat their employees, then don&#039;t work there, but don&#039;t ruine this for all the people who actually benefit from Wallmart, which is the majority of the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about Supply and Demand, do you know that for every one Wallmart worker, there are 3 lined up waiting to replace him ?</p>
<p>If Wallmart didn&#8217;t provide these jobs, there would be thousands of more people lining up for Food Stamps, and it&#8217;ll be you and I who will be paying for that.</p>
<p>No one cares about the oppertunities that Wallmart provides for these unkilled labors, nor the saving provided (Not for every single product of course).</p>
<p>Everyone wants to cry about how these Wallmart workers are treated unfairly, but the fact is that if these workers don&#8217;t like the conditions provided, they can always quit and work somewhere else.  These people choose to work at Wallmart, choose to work for minimal salary and no benefits, because they don&#8217;t have a lot of other options. </p>
<p>This is the same for people complainting about Sweat Shops in foreign countries, they don&#8217;t understand that working in the sweat shop for these kids help put food on the table for those families, help put clothes on family members.  Yes, the condition is bad, but it&#8217;s not like they have oppertunities like us in America.</p>
<p>To make this short, Wallmart works, Wallmart provide jobs for people, provides variety of products for people.  If you don&#8217;t like how they treat their employees, then don&#8217;t work there, but don&#8217;t ruine this for all the people who actually benefit from Wallmart, which is the majority of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-40182</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-40182</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you truly have a problem with their business practices, a boycott of Wal-Mart won’t solve the problem.&lt;/i&gt;

Boycotts have often put enough pressure on major American corporations to provide results. Besides, those of us who disagree with Wal-Mart for one reason or another (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laurelzimmer.com/2007/04/02/moscow-id-walmart-on-boycott-status/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my reason isn&#039;t a usual one&lt;/a&gt;) are simply falling outside of their target market. If they don&#039;t mind losing us, they don&#039;t have to change. If we start to hurt their bottom line, they&#039;ll be forced to listen. That&#039;s what the free market is all about. 

&lt;i&gt;Wal-Mart operates completely within the laws of the United States and the parameters of the marketplace.&lt;/i&gt;

Absolutely true.

&lt;i&gt;If you think their wages are too low, you should join the movement to raise the minimum wage. If you think they’re not offered appropriate health care, you should join the movement for universal health care.&lt;/i&gt;

Abwaaaah!? You just made the leap from &quot;they&#039;re doing perfectly legal things, and that&#039;s just the way the market works&quot; to &quot;manipulate the market by introducing socialist government.&quot; 

I like your blog, but I&#039;ve gotta admit - I&#039;m going to take everything you say with a major grain of salt from here on out. I just can&#039;t take a guy seriously who thinks, rather than boycotting a certain company as a good free-market consumer should do, we should all band together and stump for inflation-pushing minimum wage increases (which raise the bottom line for &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of us) and costly, inefficient universal healthcare. 

Wrong answer. Period.

&lt;i&gt;Wal-Mart’s role is to provide inexpensive products to consumers and they do this very efficiently, but within what’s allowed in the United States.&lt;/i&gt;

So let&#039;s keep the market as free as the already heavy limits on it allow, and keep the minimum wage and socialized healthcare out of it.

Wal-Mart works because people keep working there and people keep shopping there. Cut out one or both, and they will be forced to change their ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you truly have a problem with their business practices, a boycott of Wal-Mart won’t solve the problem.</i></p>
<p>Boycotts have often put enough pressure on major American corporations to provide results. Besides, those of us who disagree with Wal-Mart for one reason or another (<a href="http://www.laurelzimmer.com/2007/04/02/moscow-id-walmart-on-boycott-status/" rel="nofollow">my reason isn&#8217;t a usual one</a>) are simply falling outside of their target market. If they don&#8217;t mind losing us, they don&#8217;t have to change. If we start to hurt their bottom line, they&#8217;ll be forced to listen. That&#8217;s what the free market is all about. </p>
<p><i>Wal-Mart operates completely within the laws of the United States and the parameters of the marketplace.</i></p>
<p>Absolutely true.</p>
<p><i>If you think their wages are too low, you should join the movement to raise the minimum wage. If you think they’re not offered appropriate health care, you should join the movement for universal health care.</i></p>
<p>Abwaaaah!? You just made the leap from &#8220;they&#8217;re doing perfectly legal things, and that&#8217;s just the way the market works&#8221; to &#8220;manipulate the market by introducing socialist government.&#8221; </p>
<p>I like your blog, but I&#8217;ve gotta admit &#8211; I&#8217;m going to take everything you say with a major grain of salt from here on out. I just can&#8217;t take a guy seriously who thinks, rather than boycotting a certain company as a good free-market consumer should do, we should all band together and stump for inflation-pushing minimum wage increases (which raise the bottom line for <i>all</i> of us) and costly, inefficient universal healthcare. </p>
<p>Wrong answer. Period.</p>
<p><i>Wal-Mart’s role is to provide inexpensive products to consumers and they do this very efficiently, but within what’s allowed in the United States.</i></p>
<p>So let&#8217;s keep the market as free as the already heavy limits on it allow, and keep the minimum wage and socialized healthcare out of it.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart works because people keep working there and people keep shopping there. Cut out one or both, and they will be forced to change their ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>Several comments:
1. You had better know your prices before you go to Wal-Mart or Sam&#039;s. I agree that many times they are higher than the competition.

2. I don&#039;t shop at Wal-Mart anymore primarily because the one in my area is VERY poorly stocked.
It is also in a bad location that is very hard and dangerous to get in and out of.

3. When you add in the property tax breaks, the taxpayer subsidies for benefits, etc. Wal-Mart prices are way higher than the competition. Let&#039;s level the playing field and see if Wal-Mart can compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several comments:<br />
1. You had better know your prices before you go to Wal-Mart or Sam&#8217;s. I agree that many times they are higher than the competition.</p>
<p>2. I don&#8217;t shop at Wal-Mart anymore primarily because the one in my area is VERY poorly stocked.<br />
It is also in a bad location that is very hard and dangerous to get in and out of.</p>
<p>3. When you add in the property tax breaks, the taxpayer subsidies for benefits, etc. Wal-Mart prices are way higher than the competition. Let&#8217;s level the playing field and see if Wal-Mart can compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you think their wages are too low, you should join the movement to raise the minimum wage.&quot;

Wal-Mart supports increasing the minimum wage--they already pay above minimum wage, and benefit when their mom &amp; pop competition is also forced to do so.

If you&#039;re anti-Wal-Mart and pro-local business, you should not support minimum wage increases.

See further analysis at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://catallarchy.net/blog/archives/2006/12/07/card-and-kruegers-minimum-wage-paper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catallarchy&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you think their wages are too low, you should join the movement to raise the minimum wage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wal-Mart supports increasing the minimum wage&#8211;they already pay above minimum wage, and benefit when their mom &amp; pop competition is also forced to do so.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re anti-Wal-Mart and pro-local business, you should not support minimum wage increases.</p>
<p>See further analysis at <a HREF="http://catallarchy.net/blog/archives/2006/12/07/card-and-kruegers-minimum-wage-paper/" rel="nofollow">Catallarchy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Major</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>English Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>I know too many people who&#039;ve been scheduled for 39 hours a week to keep their jobs &quot;part-time&quot; (thus, without benefits) to support a major retailer that treats hundreds of thousands of employees that way as a matter of policy.

Maybe it&#039;s not going to change the world if I don&#039;t shop at Wal-Mart (especially since there aren&#039;t even any locations in New York, to my knowledge), but...so?  If not shopping there doesn&#039;t do any good, that means I should shop there?  That doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know too many people who&#8217;ve been scheduled for 39 hours a week to keep their jobs &#8220;part-time&#8221; (thus, without benefits) to support a major retailer that treats hundreds of thousands of employees that way as a matter of policy.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not going to change the world if I don&#8217;t shop at Wal-Mart (especially since there aren&#8217;t even any locations in New York, to my knowledge), but&#8230;so?  If not shopping there doesn&#8217;t do any good, that means I should shop there?  That doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>GREAT post! Kudos to you for exposing the good and the bad about Walmart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT post! Kudos to you for exposing the good and the bad about Walmart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Alder</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Alder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>You are making a classic error in assuming that because Wal-mart drives down THEIR cost by squeezing American suppliers that those costs are then passed on to the consumer in the form of lower prices than the competition. This is not the case, despite Wal-mart&#039;s advertising. In general the prices that are lower in Wal-mart stores are those end-of-aisle specials but if you go down the aisles the prices are on average higher, as the email you quoted made clear. This is a variant on the old bait and switch technique.

In addition to that the goods, of the end of the aisles,  that are cheaper are more often than not crap that are not worth what you pay for them and will need replacing much quicker than better quality merchandise thereby raising a regular Wal-mart shopper&#039;s cost of living, not lower inflation.

Other than they exist with in the legal framework of your country and they provide some employment for the disabled there is nothing good to be said about Wal-Mart. They suck the economic lifeblood out of every community they establish their superstores in. They are heavily subsidized by federal, municipal and state governments and they cause any supplier who is foolish enough to deal with them to go offshore and America loses more jobs. Wal-mart has squeezed the life out of more than one corporation causing them to go under by squeezing prices below profitability for the supplier.

The only time Wal-mart supports American values is in their advertising. They are amoral corporatists who have no concern for their employees, their customers, the businesses they deal with, the countries and municipalities they deal in, or any thing else except making as much money as possible. Anyone who forgets this is simply doing their PR work for them. 

They should be boycotted AND the other suggestions should be folowed. If you shop there you likely are not getting the deal you think you are getting and you are helping to support an organization that is not good for you or your country, and that is unamerican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making a classic error in assuming that because Wal-mart drives down THEIR cost by squeezing American suppliers that those costs are then passed on to the consumer in the form of lower prices than the competition. This is not the case, despite Wal-mart&#8217;s advertising. In general the prices that are lower in Wal-mart stores are those end-of-aisle specials but if you go down the aisles the prices are on average higher, as the email you quoted made clear. This is a variant on the old bait and switch technique.</p>
<p>In addition to that the goods, of the end of the aisles,  that are cheaper are more often than not crap that are not worth what you pay for them and will need replacing much quicker than better quality merchandise thereby raising a regular Wal-mart shopper&#8217;s cost of living, not lower inflation.</p>
<p>Other than they exist with in the legal framework of your country and they provide some employment for the disabled there is nothing good to be said about Wal-Mart. They suck the economic lifeblood out of every community they establish their superstores in. They are heavily subsidized by federal, municipal and state governments and they cause any supplier who is foolish enough to deal with them to go offshore and America loses more jobs. Wal-mart has squeezed the life out of more than one corporation causing them to go under by squeezing prices below profitability for the supplier.</p>
<p>The only time Wal-mart supports American values is in their advertising. They are amoral corporatists who have no concern for their employees, their customers, the businesses they deal with, the countries and municipalities they deal in, or any thing else except making as much money as possible. Anyone who forgets this is simply doing their PR work for them. </p>
<p>They should be boycotted AND the other suggestions should be folowed. If you shop there you likely are not getting the deal you think you are getting and you are helping to support an organization that is not good for you or your country, and that is unamerican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post! Fresh out of college, I have a lot of friends on an anti-walmart rampage. While I try to support mostly local retailers, it&#039;s because I live in a diverse neighborhood and can see that my buying there keeps them afloat. I don&#039;t shop at Walmart, because frankly, it&#039;s too time consuming to get in and out of one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post! Fresh out of college, I have a lot of friends on an anti-walmart rampage. While I try to support mostly local retailers, it&#8217;s because I live in a diverse neighborhood and can see that my buying there keeps them afloat. I don&#8217;t shop at Walmart, because frankly, it&#8217;s too time consuming to get in and out of one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EasyChange</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>EasyChange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Excellent, excellent post. Regardless of what you think about wal-mart, you are correct; the best place to fight these battles are through the law and  law enforcement, once the laws are on the books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, excellent post. Regardless of what you think about wal-mart, you are correct; the best place to fight these battles are through the law and  law enforcement, once the laws are on the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2006/12/13/the-wal-mart-question/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Great post...the main issue I have with Wal-Mart is the fact about so many of their employees on federally assisted health care.  In a documentary I watched, they actually had the paperwork given to employees with the information on how to apply for these benefits because they wouldn&#039;t cover those employees. They keep so many of their employees part time so that they don&#039;t have to pay their health care, but rather they &quot;make&quot; them go on federal assistance, leaving you and I to pay for their health care &quot;program&quot;. Anyway, my couple of cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post&#8230;the main issue I have with Wal-Mart is the fact about so many of their employees on federally assisted health care.  In a documentary I watched, they actually had the paperwork given to employees with the information on how to apply for these benefits because they wouldn&#8217;t cover those employees. They keep so many of their employees part time so that they don&#8217;t have to pay their health care, but rather they &#8220;make&#8221; them go on federal assistance, leaving you and I to pay for their health care &#8220;program&#8221;. Anyway, my couple of cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.379 seconds -->
