<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Simple Dollar Morning Roundup: Design Tinkering Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/</link>
	<description>Financial talk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the quote below the bit you&#039;re moving around?  I&#039;m not sure that it really distinguishes TSD from any other PF site--it sounds like a generic corporate mission statement to me.  It might be nice, though, if you included the &quot;financial talk for the rest of us&quot; in your alt text.

&quot;The Simple Dollar is for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds - we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the quote below the bit you&#8217;re moving around?  I&#8217;m not sure that it really distinguishes TSD from any other PF site&#8211;it sounds like a generic corporate mission statement to me.  It might be nice, though, if you included the &#8220;financial talk for the rest of us&#8221; in your alt text.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Simple Dollar is for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds &#8211; we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24439</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We would have a lot fewer starving seniors if we would focus more on repaying our parents by planning on taking care of them when they are older, instead of relying on the government, pensions, or something else.  While we should all save what we can for our own later years, the lack of a familial commitment is an overall negative, IMHO.

Brad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would have a lot fewer starving seniors if we would focus more on repaying our parents by planning on taking care of them when they are older, instead of relying on the government, pensions, or something else.  While we should all save what we can for our own later years, the lack of a familial commitment is an overall negative, IMHO.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24431</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James: that&#039;s roughly what we pay in Iowa for it, about 95% or so of the price of 87.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: that&#8217;s roughly what we pay in Iowa for it, about 95% or so of the price of 87.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24419</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/05/10/the-simple-dollar-morning-roundup-design-tinkering-edition/#comment-24419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10% ethanol blend is cheaper than the &quot;real stuff&quot; (even at lower octane) for a reason. Ethanol, while it is a decent fuel and can easily boost the octane of gasoline, has a significantly lower energy density than pure gasoline (25 MJ/kg compared to 45 MJ/kg). This works out to 125.5 MJ/gallon for gas and 74.6 MJ/gallon for ethanol. A 10% blend works out to have about 95% of the energy density (per gallon) as pure gasoline, so if you&#039;re paying more than 95% of the pure 87 octane price, you may not actually be saving money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 10% ethanol blend is cheaper than the &#8220;real stuff&#8221; (even at lower octane) for a reason. Ethanol, while it is a decent fuel and can easily boost the octane of gasoline, has a significantly lower energy density than pure gasoline (25 MJ/kg compared to 45 MJ/kg). This works out to 125.5 MJ/gallon for gas and 74.6 MJ/gallon for ethanol. A 10% blend works out to have about 95% of the energy density (per gallon) as pure gasoline, so if you&#8217;re paying more than 95% of the pure 87 octane price, you may not actually be saving money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
