Next Post: A Deeper Look At Dave Ramsey’s Seven Baby Steps To Financial Freedom - And How They Apply To Us
ShopSmart Magazine: A Useful Remix of Consumer Reports? 9comments
My wife picked up an issue of ShopSmart Magazine recently on the newsstand, and after reading through it, I was left with some rather conflicted thoughts.
First of all, ShopSmart is an offshoot of Consumer Reports. It features the Consumer Reports logo quite largely on the upper right corner of the cover, and the interior has a lot in common with CR as well - neither magazine features any ads for items aside from “ads” for other publications and services from the CR family. This is a feature I really like in a magazine, and it’s one of the big determining factors for whether I like a magazine or not. For example, I’m utterly enamored with Make in part for that very reason - no ads makes reading a magazine a much more pleasurable experience.
The biggest difference between ShopSmart and Consumer Reports is the target audience. While Consumer Reports is at best gender-neutral and on occasion male-leaning for their audience, ShopSmart is unabashedly female. This issue alone has a lengthy article on women’s shoes and a nice two page spread on tampons. While CR will occasionally feature a gender-biased article like this, ShopSmart carries this right up front.
Another major change: no rankings, just specific product recommendations. Consumer Reports is famous for their extensive ratings and rankings, and I love poring over those multiple pages of data just to get a real feel for how the marketplace stacks up for specific products. That’s not happening here - ShopSmart basically provides one (and occasionally two or three) very specific recommendations in specific product areas. For example, in the four page article on washing machines, rather than listing a whole ton of models and saying how they rank, it just gives three recommendations. The good news is that these agree strongly with the recommendations in Consumer Reports.
In fact, the content overlap between Consumer Reports and ShopSmart is quite large. Just leafing through the issue, I saw several articles that were basically rewrites of articles that appeared in the last few months of Consumer Reports, with almost identical conclusions.
What changed? The layout, for one. ShopSmart is laid out much differently than CR, obviously going for a more modern feel that reminds me of Real Simple. It’s got lots of whitespace, small blurbs of text, and lots of pastels and lighter tones for the colors. It’s clearly meant to be browsed - the articles are short and barely continue from page to page. Most of them, in fact, are 200 words or less, and often two or three appear on the same page.
If you like the conclusions of Consumer Reports, but find it to be too dry and overly detailed (especially if you’re a woman), then ShopSmart might be worth reading. It often provides the same end product recommendations as Consumer Reports and the tips themselves throughout the issue are strong. However, if you like the detail and data of Consumer Reports (like I do), this one will frustrate you.
As for my wife? She seemed to enjoy the issue of ShopSmart a lot and read it far more than I’ve ever seen her look at Consumer Reports - for better or worse. For me, I’ll stick with the “boring” Consumer Reports.
Hi Trent,
This seems like they are trying to increase women readers for their publications, and are re-branding CR to do so. There is a case to be made for providing simple recommendations instead of lengthy and dry comparison charts. However, it also seems like they are “dumbing down” the material for women too - focusing more on aesthetics than content.
See http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/look-how-mens-and-womens-magazines-write-about-money
“no ads makes reading a magazine a much more pleasurable experience”
I really don’t get this concept. I don’t mind ads in my magazines because I can skip them at will. Its not like TV where you are interrupted every five minutes and forced to look at an ad. Also, its not like if the ads all go away, there would somehow be more content or something. The book would just be a little slimmer.
Also, I kind of like the art and screenshots in some of them. Of course, I mainly read videogame magazines, so maybe that is the difference.
To each his own, I suppose.
Interesting comment about the ads. I’m just wondering how magazines have the funding to publish when they don’t have ads.
No ratings just recommendations? Sounds to me like they’re dumbing down the magazine for women.
I also have to wonder if the shorter articles and lack of detailed articles is not only dumbing down for women, but pandering to the stereotype of SAHMs. Really, do we need another magazine aimed at women whose only focus is to pander to bored SAHMs and those who aren’t intellectual or career-oriented?
An article on tampons is not so much “gender biased” but gender-specific or maybe gender-centric, in this case female. Personally this sounds like a dumbed-down version of CR, and a woman’s mag at that, which is a bit insulting, but hey, it’s just like most other “women’s” magazines. Then again, it may be an attempt to compete with the other shopping magazines like Dominio, Lucky, and that other one…Cookie? In a sense at least those magazines are being honest about their goals-it’s all about getting you to buy stuff.
Overall, I don’t consider CR or other magazines without ads/sponsors to be true magazines and it’s hard to compare those to the more traditional kind that have to create content based on which companies are buying ad space.
Sure does ring of Ramit’s guest author’s comments on PF publishing “for women.” Dumb li’l thangs that we are, we just can’t figure out how to read all those complicated charts, eh? Must be why we think there’s still money in the checking account as long as we still have checks.
I looked at ShopSmart, and what struck me is that it has a lot of subjective reports. This is where Consumer Reports is weakest: things like wine recommendations (ech!), and hevvin help us i do wish they would SHUT UP about the industrial perfumes in shampoos ’cause whenever they issue one of their fiats my fave manufacturers reformulate to market something that smells truly icky and then I have to beat the bushes for a new nonstinky shampoo. CU is best at objective comparisons based on hard facts, and it would be good if its editors would stick to that. The last thing we need is something for us girls full of unranked “recommendations.”
It would be a shame if Consumer Reports shunts all the articles on women’s topics into ShopSmart.
Leave a reply
Next Post: A Deeper Look At Dave Ramsey’s Seven Baby Steps To Financial Freedom - And How They Apply To Us







Amen to that. I have an online CR subscription and it continues to support me in making the best decisions with my cash.
November 2007 has a new “Ultra High Performance Tire” report, which could not have come at a better time for me. Using their data I was able to decide on and buy a set of tires for $400 instead of $900 with minimal difference in quality. When you go through a set of tires every year, this is huge.
I’ll stick with the “boring” one too.. I love the details.
hustlinpete @ 10:38 am October 25th, 2007 (comment #1)