<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Portfolio of Credit Cards for Specific Purchases?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/</link>
	<description>Simple, applicable personal finance advice for the modern world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:03:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan S.@uncommon-cents.net</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-2/#comment-272111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan S.@uncommon-cents.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-272111</guid>
		<description>I have two different gas cards (Discover Open Road and Pentagon FCU) for 5% back; Amazon Visa for 3% back on Amazon stuff and extended warranties; and an AmEx card for eating out (3%) or Costco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two different gas cards (Discover Open Road and Pentagon FCU) for 5% back; Amazon Visa for 3% back on Amazon stuff and extended warranties; and an AmEx card for eating out (3%) or Costco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-270303</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-270303</guid>
		<description>Credit cards are controversial.  However, in my view  its probably better to avoid credit cards all together.  Just get a debit card or check card and go to all cash. Why bother running the risk of incurring high fees? 

Best, 

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit cards are controversial.  However, in my view  its probably better to avoid credit cards all together.  Just get a debit card or check card and go to all cash. Why bother running the risk of incurring high fees? </p>
<p>Best, </p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-267401</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-267401</guid>
		<description>Yoth:
I agree with your conclusion, but not with the analysis, I should have been clearer. 

Several brief points on FICO scoring that are in public domain are below. 

General modeling: The purpose of a FICO score is to estimate the probability you will not pay your bills. Fair Isaac gathered a large amount of data for people who did and did not default on credit obligations and what was in their credit report. Using this data, they developed a model that is applied to your data. The model does not make value judgments and should be relatively unbiased, but it isn&#039;t perfect because of variable choice and inaccuracies in training data. Also, the model may contradict what you logically deduce about credit scores including the less cards/lower limits is better fallacy.

Scorecards: You are assigned to a scorecard or sub-population based on information in your credit report including people with bankruptcies, no late payments, thin files, etc. Data in your file will be treated differently depending on your scorecard. For instance, someone may lose points when a bankruptcy is removed because they moved from the bankruptcy scorecard to a non-bankruptcy scorecard and compared to the new population they are predicted to be more likely to default. However, they may have a higher potential score in the future on the non-bankruptcy scorecard. Similarly, someone with a thin file scorecard may lose more points for inquires or utilizing a high proportion of their unsecured credit limits than someone with more established credit. The scorecards and models change continually to account for trends and improved modeling techniques.

Many banks have their own internal scoring models that may incorporate FICO score and other data they feel is not represented well with FICO, but are important to them including income, job type, zip code, and the number of doors on the car you drive. They may try to get this information from you and/or a database like ChoicePoint&#039;s. Also, upon manual review they may ask you to do things that will lower your FICO score, but make them feel more comfortable like closing credit cards or lowering limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoth:<br />
I agree with your conclusion, but not with the analysis, I should have been clearer. </p>
<p>Several brief points on FICO scoring that are in public domain are below. </p>
<p>General modeling: The purpose of a FICO score is to estimate the probability you will not pay your bills. Fair Isaac gathered a large amount of data for people who did and did not default on credit obligations and what was in their credit report. Using this data, they developed a model that is applied to your data. The model does not make value judgments and should be relatively unbiased, but it isn&#8217;t perfect because of variable choice and inaccuracies in training data. Also, the model may contradict what you logically deduce about credit scores including the less cards/lower limits is better fallacy.</p>
<p>Scorecards: You are assigned to a scorecard or sub-population based on information in your credit report including people with bankruptcies, no late payments, thin files, etc. Data in your file will be treated differently depending on your scorecard. For instance, someone may lose points when a bankruptcy is removed because they moved from the bankruptcy scorecard to a non-bankruptcy scorecard and compared to the new population they are predicted to be more likely to default. However, they may have a higher potential score in the future on the non-bankruptcy scorecard. Similarly, someone with a thin file scorecard may lose more points for inquires or utilizing a high proportion of their unsecured credit limits than someone with more established credit. The scorecards and models change continually to account for trends and improved modeling techniques.</p>
<p>Many banks have their own internal scoring models that may incorporate FICO score and other data they feel is not represented well with FICO, but are important to them including income, job type, zip code, and the number of doors on the car you drive. They may try to get this information from you and/or a database like ChoicePoint&#8217;s. Also, upon manual review they may ask you to do things that will lower your FICO score, but make them feel more comfortable like closing credit cards or lowering limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less is More Edition - Personal Finance Review &#187; Money Smart Life</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-266949</link>
		<dc:creator>Less is More Edition - Personal Finance Review &#187; Money Smart Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-266949</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; Credit Card Portfolio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &ndash; Credit Card Portfolio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JReed</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-263097</link>
		<dc:creator>JReed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-263097</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this as for entertainment purposes only....I use this site to gather information on what other people are doing to stretch their incomes and manage their money. I learn from Trent but I learn much more from the other bloggers...they are a sharp and shrewd portion of the educational value of this site. Accuracy and truthfulness should be valued and acknowledged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as for entertainment purposes only&#8230;.I use this site to gather information on what other people are doing to stretch their incomes and manage their money. I learn from Trent but I learn much more from the other bloggers&#8230;they are a sharp and shrewd portion of the educational value of this site. Accuracy and truthfulness should be valued and acknowledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen@recoveringfoodwaster</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-262071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen@recoveringfoodwaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-262071</guid>
		<description>I used to have about 6-8 going, and that was indeed too many for me to keep up with.

Now I have a Discover Gas(5% back on gas), an American Express Citi card(4% back, but I can use it at Costco, and it has something like 4-5% back at drugstores and grocery stores), and a Chase Freedom card.  All of these save the Discover card also have a 1 point per dollar kind of thing for purchases that aren&#039;t gas or drug or grocery stores.

I also have some other random cards that give me coupons regularly just for owning them(Victoria&#039;s Secret and JCP), but I don&#039;t usually use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have about 6-8 going, and that was indeed too many for me to keep up with.</p>
<p>Now I have a Discover Gas(5% back on gas), an American Express Citi card(4% back, but I can use it at Costco, and it has something like 4-5% back at drugstores and grocery stores), and a Chase Freedom card.  All of these save the Discover card also have a 1 point per dollar kind of thing for purchases that aren&#8217;t gas or drug or grocery stores.</p>
<p>I also have some other random cards that give me coupons regularly just for owning them(Victoria&#8217;s Secret and JCP), but I don&#8217;t usually use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoth</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261928</link>
		<dc:creator>yoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261928</guid>
		<description>Credit: I stated that increasing credit would not decrease a FICO score over time, while you stated further down that more credit cards with higher limits would increase your score over time.  The original blog entry stated it would hurt your score.  If you agree with your comment you must agree with mine.  Both agree that it will not harm your credit score long-term although I mentioned (I thought tongue in cheek) that you could only avoid any harm by never getting any credit cards.  You agree with the general sentiment that the blog entry has inaccuracies and Caveat Emptor.  

Matt: Your assessment was the extreme that I was (I thought) humorously calling out: the only way to avoid impact to your credit score is to NEVER get your first credit card.  If you ever get one then you would be hit with the penalty of having opened a new line of credit, right?  You cited length of credit, but I think that applies to the aggregate not the individual line of credit.  Maybe it’s referring to average credit length but that would not be likely, I think, as it would heavily skew against those with a new line of credit.  You also called attention to the distribution of credit.  I don’t know if that is based on dollars or number of credit lines?  Maybe Credit could speak more to these matters and perhaps dedicate a blog to this matter?

Also, accuracy importance; you are right, the numbers don’t matter to you and maybe a good number of others.  There is a recent blog entry on TSD covering left versus right-brained personal finance.  This is potentially an example of the dialogue difference.  Irritation at mathematical anomalies (notice, I’m not saying inaccuracies) are unimportant to you.  It’s important to others, though, and to keep those people satisfied with this blog and driving revenue to TSD, that accuracy has to be present.  
Maybe there could be a retractions/corrections section at the bottom of the entry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit: I stated that increasing credit would not decrease a FICO score over time, while you stated further down that more credit cards with higher limits would increase your score over time.  The original blog entry stated it would hurt your score.  If you agree with your comment you must agree with mine.  Both agree that it will not harm your credit score long-term although I mentioned (I thought tongue in cheek) that you could only avoid any harm by never getting any credit cards.  You agree with the general sentiment that the blog entry has inaccuracies and Caveat Emptor.  </p>
<p>Matt: Your assessment was the extreme that I was (I thought) humorously calling out: the only way to avoid impact to your credit score is to NEVER get your first credit card.  If you ever get one then you would be hit with the penalty of having opened a new line of credit, right?  You cited length of credit, but I think that applies to the aggregate not the individual line of credit.  Maybe it’s referring to average credit length but that would not be likely, I think, as it would heavily skew against those with a new line of credit.  You also called attention to the distribution of credit.  I don’t know if that is based on dollars or number of credit lines?  Maybe Credit could speak more to these matters and perhaps dedicate a blog to this matter?</p>
<p>Also, accuracy importance; you are right, the numbers don’t matter to you and maybe a good number of others.  There is a recent blog entry on TSD covering left versus right-brained personal finance.  This is potentially an example of the dialogue difference.  Irritation at mathematical anomalies (notice, I’m not saying inaccuracies) are unimportant to you.  It’s important to others, though, and to keep those people satisfied with this blog and driving revenue to TSD, that accuracy has to be present.<br />
Maybe there could be a retractions/corrections section at the bottom of the entry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261880</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261880</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a simple risk model for the probability of defaulting on credit obligations. They normalize the probability to a convenient score. If Fair Isaac revealed all the model coefficients, people could easily manipulate their score, which would make the score useless. There is so much money being made on the scoring models that it not be smart to post inside knowledge on your website. However, it is clear and in public domain that closing cards (especially old ones) will lower your score over time. Having many cards with high limits and low utilization will increase your score over time. Secured credit obligations like car loans and mortgages have less of an influence on FICO score, but having a few of them generally increases credit score. These things have an impact because the people who had that data in their file were more or less likely to default on their credit obligations when the model was developed or updated. It&#039;s not perfect, but it&#039;s better than people not getting a house because of the color of their skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a simple risk model for the probability of defaulting on credit obligations. They normalize the probability to a convenient score. If Fair Isaac revealed all the model coefficients, people could easily manipulate their score, which would make the score useless. There is so much money being made on the scoring models that it not be smart to post inside knowledge on your website. However, it is clear and in public domain that closing cards (especially old ones) will lower your score over time. Having many cards with high limits and low utilization will increase your score over time. Secured credit obligations like car loans and mortgages have less of an influence on FICO score, but having a few of them generally increases credit score. These things have an impact because the people who had that data in their file were more or less likely to default on their credit obligations when the model was developed or updated. It&#8217;s not perfect, but it&#8217;s better than people not getting a house because of the color of their skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261810</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261810</guid>
		<description>Credit, a big part of the problem is that FICO keeps the formula for credit cards a trade secret, meaning that no one outside of Fair Isaac truly knows how they work.  Our best bet is to interpret what they say, and that&#039;s a sticky wicket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit, a big part of the problem is that FICO keeps the formula for credit cards a trade secret, meaning that no one outside of Fair Isaac truly knows how they work.  Our best bet is to interpret what they say, and that&#8217;s a sticky wicket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261706</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261706</guid>
		<description>Yoth and Matt:
Both of your analyses of FICO scoring models are wrong. The percent breakdown, scoring codes provided, and most advice on finance websites is either misleading or incorrect. The percent breakdown makes people feel comfortable with modeling because if the default modeling procedure was explained it would not make sense to most of people. However, it&#039;s misleading because the actual variables used in the model include interactions between things like mix and length of history. These variables are quantified in ways that don&#039;t follow the logical arguments that people make on most websites and if they were explained it would be easier to manipulate. In addition, the model is non-linear and you are assigned to a score card that determines how the variables are treated depending on your credit profile. The scoring codes are almost as misleading as the percent breakdown because the quantitative model cannot be translated into a logical sentence. Unfortunately, most web authors and people on TV do not understand modeling and try to simplify things so that they can write a nice concise article or TV segment with seemingly logical statements about how variables impact your score. However, in many cases including on The Simple Dollar the advice provided will decrease your potential FICO score. Finally, I reply because I value the content of this website. I have used many ideas on this website to streamline my life and in appreciation I would like to provide advice that others may use to save some money. Unfortunately, default models like FICO are used for all kinds of things including most insurance products, mortgages, car loans and credit card interest rates. Certain decisions like closing credit cards could cost thousands of dollars potentially nullifying years of coupon clipping and laundry detergent making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoth and Matt:<br />
Both of your analyses of FICO scoring models are wrong. The percent breakdown, scoring codes provided, and most advice on finance websites is either misleading or incorrect. The percent breakdown makes people feel comfortable with modeling because if the default modeling procedure was explained it would not make sense to most of people. However, it&#8217;s misleading because the actual variables used in the model include interactions between things like mix and length of history. These variables are quantified in ways that don&#8217;t follow the logical arguments that people make on most websites and if they were explained it would be easier to manipulate. In addition, the model is non-linear and you are assigned to a score card that determines how the variables are treated depending on your credit profile. The scoring codes are almost as misleading as the percent breakdown because the quantitative model cannot be translated into a logical sentence. Unfortunately, most web authors and people on TV do not understand modeling and try to simplify things so that they can write a nice concise article or TV segment with seemingly logical statements about how variables impact your score. However, in many cases including on The Simple Dollar the advice provided will decrease your potential FICO score. Finally, I reply because I value the content of this website. I have used many ideas on this website to streamline my life and in appreciation I would like to provide advice that others may use to save some money. Unfortunately, default models like FICO are used for all kinds of things including most insurance products, mortgages, car loans and credit card interest rates. Certain decisions like closing credit cards could cost thousands of dollars potentially nullifying years of coupon clipping and laundry detergent making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261639</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261639</guid>
		<description>hmmmm...all of that, plus the temptation of overspending on all those junk offers to save $14.00 each month? I save over $200 each month by sensible shopping and grocery coupons...it does take time (I&#039;ve got 35 years in doing this)..but there is no risk from those &quot;dangerous power tools&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm&#8230;all of that, plus the temptation of overspending on all those junk offers to save $14.00 each month? I save over $200 each month by sensible shopping and grocery coupons&#8230;it does take time (I&#8217;ve got 35 years in doing this)..but there is no risk from those &#8220;dangerous power tools&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261518</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261518</guid>
		<description>ANY online personal finance site you read, whether it&#039;s &quot;professional&quot; or not, is for entertainment purposes only.  An article written for a general audience is ALWAYS intended for entertainment purposes, whether it&#039;s here or on MSMoney or the Wall Street Journal.  I put that disclaimer there to make it clear to people - I think that&#039;s the honest thing to do.

As for this whole mess about the interest rate, the interest rate on that last card doesn&#039;t matter.  You can make it 1% (the worst rate you can get from Amex Blue - and if you were spending that much each month, you WOULD get better than that) and the argument still holds - the portfolio interest rate is still above 3% (3.17%).  I arbitrarily made it 3% because the spending on that last card is going to be by far the most variable - you can&#039;t pigeonhole it.  Sure, you could come up with a calculation and pin it to some number between 1 and 5, but the argument still holds even at the minimum, so it&#039;s basically pedantic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANY online personal finance site you read, whether it&#8217;s &#8220;professional&#8221; or not, is for entertainment purposes only.  An article written for a general audience is ALWAYS intended for entertainment purposes, whether it&#8217;s here or on MSMoney or the Wall Street Journal.  I put that disclaimer there to make it clear to people &#8211; I think that&#8217;s the honest thing to do.</p>
<p>As for this whole mess about the interest rate, the interest rate on that last card doesn&#8217;t matter.  You can make it 1% (the worst rate you can get from Amex Blue &#8211; and if you were spending that much each month, you WOULD get better than that) and the argument still holds &#8211; the portfolio interest rate is still above 3% (3.17%).  I arbitrarily made it 3% because the spending on that last card is going to be by far the most variable &#8211; you can&#8217;t pigeonhole it.  Sure, you could come up with a calculation and pin it to some number between 1 and 5, but the argument still holds even at the minimum, so it&#8217;s basically pedantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-261225</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-261225</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I have to requote myself to rebut yoth and credit&#039;s statements.  Sheesh:

&quot;And with the credit card comment: It DOES make a difference what type of credit you possess. Credit reporting agencies care if you have a large amount of debt you can pull from, because revolving credit cards are easily accessible (and are hence a credit risk). I should know, I worked with credit card companies for 2 years.&quot;

Yoth even put it down straight from the credit reporting agency:  &quot;10% on the mix of credit accounts you have (mortgages, credit cards, installment loans, etc.)&quot;

The only way more credit cards with higher balances will improve your FICO score over time is if you&#039;re comparing your score to what it was the minute after you signed up for all these credit cards...  since, from yoth again:  &quot;15% on the length of your credit history.&quot;

And the point about the math was that people would rather focus on whether $6000/month or $7200/month or whatever per month is accurate, instead of the fact that the logic was sound.  I mean, you might as well argue that Trent suggesting $1500/month spent on a credit card per month is $18000/year (anyone want to correct my math?), which is ridiculous and I&#039;d be surprised if even 5% of credit card users hit this mark.

And @CallingItOut...  thank you so much for telling me what this site is.  I had no idea that a blog called TheSimpleDollar wasn&#039;t a professional financial website.  Thanks for the update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I have to requote myself to rebut yoth and credit&#8217;s statements.  Sheesh:</p>
<p>&#8220;And with the credit card comment: It DOES make a difference what type of credit you possess. Credit reporting agencies care if you have a large amount of debt you can pull from, because revolving credit cards are easily accessible (and are hence a credit risk). I should know, I worked with credit card companies for 2 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yoth even put it down straight from the credit reporting agency:  &#8220;10% on the mix of credit accounts you have (mortgages, credit cards, installment loans, etc.)&#8221;</p>
<p>The only way more credit cards with higher balances will improve your FICO score over time is if you&#8217;re comparing your score to what it was the minute after you signed up for all these credit cards&#8230;  since, from yoth again:  &#8220;15% on the length of your credit history.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the point about the math was that people would rather focus on whether $6000/month or $7200/month or whatever per month is accurate, instead of the fact that the logic was sound.  I mean, you might as well argue that Trent suggesting $1500/month spent on a credit card per month is $18000/year (anyone want to correct my math?), which is ridiculous and I&#8217;d be surprised if even 5% of credit card users hit this mark.</p>
<p>And @CallingItOut&#8230;  thank you so much for telling me what this site is.  I had no idea that a blog called TheSimpleDollar wasn&#8217;t a professional financial website.  Thanks for the update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-260575</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-260575</guid>
		<description>I think it is fun to log onto different accounts and track the balances etc etc.  Geeky, maybe, but fun.  So for those people with the discipline and inclination, why not juggle the rewards to your best advantage?  If you don&#039;t enjoy that or find it too risky, then don&#039;t.  I don&#039;t think it is odd to want to make homemade laundry soap but not juggle accounts.  From what I&#039;ve read, Trent sees the laundry soap as one big batch of fun slime science that also happens to save money.  I personally am not interested in making the soap, but I would have fun with the accounting, so I&#039;d be more likely to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is fun to log onto different accounts and track the balances etc etc.  Geeky, maybe, but fun.  So for those people with the discipline and inclination, why not juggle the rewards to your best advantage?  If you don&#8217;t enjoy that or find it too risky, then don&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t think it is odd to want to make homemade laundry soap but not juggle accounts.  From what I&#8217;ve read, Trent sees the laundry soap as one big batch of fun slime science that also happens to save money.  I personally am not interested in making the soap, but I would have fun with the accounting, so I&#8217;d be more likely to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JReed</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-260462</link>
		<dc:creator>JReed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-260462</guid>
		<description>We do use several cards and while we get checks back from these companies, it is really the ease of bookkeeping that prompts us to do so.
Each card has its purpose written in permanent marker right on the face. Health (we use hsa&#039;s, so this gets paid right out of the hsa accounts);
Material and supplies (paid out of business account; Gas and vehicle expenses; and Personal.
The material/supply card lets me type in job names for each receipt, so that helps me when billing customers. Because two people are charging on the same accounts, the magic marker titles on the front keeps it consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do use several cards and while we get checks back from these companies, it is really the ease of bookkeeping that prompts us to do so.<br />
Each card has its purpose written in permanent marker right on the face. Health (we use hsa&#8217;s, so this gets paid right out of the hsa accounts);<br />
Material and supplies (paid out of business account; Gas and vehicle expenses; and Personal.<br />
The material/supply card lets me type in job names for each receipt, so that helps me when billing customers. Because two people are charging on the same accounts, the magic marker titles on the front keeps it consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allie</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-259980</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-259980</guid>
		<description>Although the cash back or rewards does sound good, it seems like a lot of work to keep track of 8 cards. That&#039;s 8 separate bills to check for accuracy, 8 different payments, and 8 different due dates to make sure you don&#039;t miss. Missing just one of those payment dates would ruin the low interest rate (if you carried a balance) and would hurt your credit score. That seems like a lot of risk and headache for a small reward. 

For me, using two cards that give me the best rewards for the bulk of my purchases is a lot easier and safer. I guess it all depends on your risk/reward personality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the cash back or rewards does sound good, it seems like a lot of work to keep track of 8 cards. That&#8217;s 8 separate bills to check for accuracy, 8 different payments, and 8 different due dates to make sure you don&#8217;t miss. Missing just one of those payment dates would ruin the low interest rate (if you carried a balance) and would hurt your credit score. That seems like a lot of risk and headache for a small reward. </p>
<p>For me, using two cards that give me the best rewards for the bulk of my purchases is a lot easier and safer. I guess it all depends on your risk/reward personality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman MIller</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-259974</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman MIller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-259974</guid>
		<description>I use the Amazon.com Visa card and I&#039;ve very happy with it. 

I read alot as a hobby and use the $25 certificates to purchase books.

I joined Amazon Prime to get the 2 day shipping free.

I also buy a lot at Amazon.

The $25 certificates go a long way to paying for the Prime membership and getting me free books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Amazon.com Visa card and I&#8217;ve very happy with it. </p>
<p>I read alot as a hobby and use the $25 certificates to purchase books.</p>
<p>I joined Amazon Prime to get the 2 day shipping free.</p>
<p>I also buy a lot at Amazon.</p>
<p>The $25 certificates go a long way to paying for the Prime membership and getting me free books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-259864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-259864</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got 2 rewards cards.

One is the Chase PerfectCard, which gives 3% cash back on gas. There is no need to accumulate points or a certain amount of money, you just get 3% back on your next statement (even if it&#039;s only $0.50, which has happened).

The other is the Chase Freedom card, which someone else mentioned. I generally spend enough to max out the $600 cap on the 3% cash back. I&#039;m doing the $250 for $200 thing so the effective rate is 3.75%. Of course, anything over $600 is only 1% cash back. That&#039;s the reason I got the gas card.

So I pretty much get around 3% cash back. Since both cards are with Chase, there&#039;s only one website to visit to pay bills. There&#039;s also the option to automatically pay the full statement balance without having to log in, but I prefer looking over it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got 2 rewards cards.</p>
<p>One is the Chase PerfectCard, which gives 3% cash back on gas. There is no need to accumulate points or a certain amount of money, you just get 3% back on your next statement (even if it&#8217;s only $0.50, which has happened).</p>
<p>The other is the Chase Freedom card, which someone else mentioned. I generally spend enough to max out the $600 cap on the 3% cash back. I&#8217;m doing the $250 for $200 thing so the effective rate is 3.75%. Of course, anything over $600 is only 1% cash back. That&#8217;s the reason I got the gas card.</p>
<p>So I pretty much get around 3% cash back. Since both cards are with Chase, there&#8217;s only one website to visit to pay bills. There&#8217;s also the option to automatically pay the full statement balance without having to log in, but I prefer looking over it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-259790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-259790</guid>
		<description>There is good advice on both sides of this arguement.  I use 3 cashback cards.  That is a number that is easily managable for me, requires very little time (actually none if I were lazy because I have them set up for an automatic draft from my checking account each month).  I get email and snail mail reminders when and how much will be drawn out.  I do like to check and make sure all the transactions are accurate (about 10 mintutes a month.  I maximize some of my payouts by getting vouchers from allied merchants that I will be buying from anyway, but mostly I take cash.  BEST THING OF ALL, the payout is not taxed by the IRS.  It&#039;s the only way I know you can legally avoid taxes while earning money.  I have 2 cards that give me 3-5% on specific purchases and one that gives me 1.4% (Emigrant MC)on all purchases, but it does require $10K in a savings account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is good advice on both sides of this arguement.  I use 3 cashback cards.  That is a number that is easily managable for me, requires very little time (actually none if I were lazy because I have them set up for an automatic draft from my checking account each month).  I get email and snail mail reminders when and how much will be drawn out.  I do like to check and make sure all the transactions are accurate (about 10 mintutes a month.  I maximize some of my payouts by getting vouchers from allied merchants that I will be buying from anyway, but mostly I take cash.  BEST THING OF ALL, the payout is not taxed by the IRS.  It&#8217;s the only way I know you can legally avoid taxes while earning money.  I have 2 cards that give me 3-5% on specific purchases and one that gives me 1.4% (Emigrant MC)on all purchases, but it does require $10K in a savings account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-259782</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/04/30/a-portfolio-of-credit-cards-for-specific-purchases/#comment-259782</guid>
		<description>Matt: More credit cards with higher limits will increase your FICO score over time. It is important to correct false statements. In fact, to not do so would be disrespectful and causes people like George to misunderstand the impact on his FICO score, which could cost him thousands of dollars. I&#039;m not sure what you do for the credit card company, but it&#039;s clearly not in modeling or risk assessment. Similarly, checking the numbers or providing other perspectives increases the value of information presented on this website as long as it&#039;s done respectfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: More credit cards with higher limits will increase your FICO score over time. It is important to correct false statements. In fact, to not do so would be disrespectful and causes people like George to misunderstand the impact on his FICO score, which could cost him thousands of dollars. I&#8217;m not sure what you do for the credit card company, but it&#8217;s clearly not in modeling or risk assessment. Similarly, checking the numbers or providing other perspectives increases the value of information presented on this website as long as it&#8217;s done respectfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.410 seconds -->
