<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bills Your Parents Didn&#8217;t Have</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/</link>
	<description>Simple, applicable personal finance advice for the modern world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-932125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-932125</guid>
		<description>Bugs me that people insist they need cable because their reception is terrible and without it they&#039;d have no tv at all.  I turn on my tv maybe once or twice a year when we have inclement weather to decide whether to go downstairs and that is the extent of our tv usage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugs me that people insist they need cable because their reception is terrible and without it they&#8217;d have no tv at all.  I turn on my tv maybe once or twice a year when we have inclement weather to decide whether to go downstairs and that is the extent of our tv usage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-932124</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-932124</guid>
		<description>My bills are essentially the same as those listed except I also have internet.  We don&#039;t support any kids and we did have one income for a long time.  And we only had car payments for the first 2 years of marriage that is now paid off.  So now we have enough stashed away that if we had to replace our car we could afford to replace it with a used one and pay cash for it.

Our health insurance is crazy high, $900 a month.  My husbands work pays a measly $300 of our $1,200 plan.  I bet health insurance didnt used to be that expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bills are essentially the same as those listed except I also have internet.  We don&#8217;t support any kids and we did have one income for a long time.  And we only had car payments for the first 2 years of marriage that is now paid off.  So now we have enough stashed away that if we had to replace our car we could afford to replace it with a used one and pay cash for it.</p>
<p>Our health insurance is crazy high, $900 a month.  My husbands work pays a measly $300 of our $1,200 plan.  I bet health insurance didnt used to be that expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-856615</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-856615</guid>
		<description>Yeah...I wish I could maintain the cost of living my parents have.  They live in a rural area where burning trash along with composting is fine.  All the other items go into recycling bins...which they have the inconvenience of needing to drive them to a drop-off center.  Our average home price in the greater Philly area is 3x-4x more than the average home price in my parents&#039; area.  They have a shallow well / septic and it has its pros and cons like anything else.  Your water usage can be highly limited depending on average rainfall.  You typically have costs associated with a water softener/purification system, also.  Y&#039;know, unless you want a glass of brown, sulfur-smelling drinking water. 

The major difference between myself and my parents is student loan debt.  They never dealt with it as they didn&#039;t attend college.  It&#039;s a debt I&#039;m completely okay with as its allowed me greater opportunity.  

I guarantee the amount my parents spent at disco clubs in the late 70s (with inflation factored in) probably trumps what I pay on a monthly basis for entertainment.  I&#039;m cheap in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;I wish I could maintain the cost of living my parents have.  They live in a rural area where burning trash along with composting is fine.  All the other items go into recycling bins&#8230;which they have the inconvenience of needing to drive them to a drop-off center.  Our average home price in the greater Philly area is 3x-4x more than the average home price in my parents&#8217; area.  They have a shallow well / septic and it has its pros and cons like anything else.  Your water usage can be highly limited depending on average rainfall.  You typically have costs associated with a water softener/purification system, also.  Y&#8217;know, unless you want a glass of brown, sulfur-smelling drinking water. </p>
<p>The major difference between myself and my parents is student loan debt.  They never dealt with it as they didn&#8217;t attend college.  It&#8217;s a debt I&#8217;m completely okay with as its allowed me greater opportunity.  </p>
<p>I guarantee the amount my parents spent at disco clubs in the late 70s (with inflation factored in) probably trumps what I pay on a monthly basis for entertainment.  I&#8217;m cheap in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-856177</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-856177</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry guys, but I have to ask.  Do Americans have to pay to have their garbage taken away??  As a Canadian, I just pay my taxes and that&#039;s all I need to worry about.  Garbage service is a necessity, not an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry guys, but I have to ask.  Do Americans have to pay to have their garbage taken away??  As a Canadian, I just pay my taxes and that&#8217;s all I need to worry about.  Garbage service is a necessity, not an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PennySeeds.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-515296</link>
		<dc:creator>PennySeeds.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-515296</guid>
		<description>A well may or may not save you more money honestly. You won&#039;t have a water bill, but the electricity required to use your pump will cost you more money.

I cut cable out all together, and I went to having only a cellphone instead of having a home phone too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well may or may not save you more money honestly. You won&#8217;t have a water bill, but the electricity required to use your pump will cost you more money.</p>
<p>I cut cable out all together, and I went to having only a cellphone instead of having a home phone too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-508597</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-508597</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a SAHM for 8 years.  My husband is a SSGT in the Air Force, so you know he&#039;s not making a ton of money!  We have 3 kids and one dog.  We own a house and that is the only debt we have.  The way we stay on budget is we take out a certain amount of money in cash every week to cover food, gas and anything fun we want to do.  We then put the money into separate envelopes and then that&#039;s it for the week.  Over the past 2 years, we&#039;ve saved enough money for 2 vacations a year and paid cash for christmas and birthdays by doing this.  We also save $4,000 for our IRA and $7,000 in our long term savings account per year.  This is out of a $57,000 per year income.
I&#039;m telling you guys, PAY CASH and save.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a SAHM for 8 years.  My husband is a SSGT in the Air Force, so you know he&#8217;s not making a ton of money!  We have 3 kids and one dog.  We own a house and that is the only debt we have.  The way we stay on budget is we take out a certain amount of money in cash every week to cover food, gas and anything fun we want to do.  We then put the money into separate envelopes and then that&#8217;s it for the week.  Over the past 2 years, we&#8217;ve saved enough money for 2 vacations a year and paid cash for christmas and birthdays by doing this.  We also save $4,000 for our IRA and $7,000 in our long term savings account per year.  This is out of a $57,000 per year income.<br />
I&#8217;m telling you guys, PAY CASH and save.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-506387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-506387</guid>
		<description>Our insurance agent sends us a birthday card every year that includes a flier listing the cost of items the year we were born versus the cost of items now -- along with the average income (we are in our late 30s). One day I ran the numbers and determined the following:

Consumer goods and commodities are the same or less relative to average income. A gallon of milk now costs the same as back then -- as a percent of what people made.

The two listed exceptions:

Housing
Automobiles

Which were both an order of magnitude higher compared to income. To that list I think we can agree to add college tuition and health care.

Naturally the modern &quot;average&quot; home or car is bigger/safer/fancier than back then. Still there&#039;s no doubt that even a basic house or car costs much more than it did three decades ago.

In addition, I would argue that consumer items have to be purchased more frequently now due to planned obsolescence and / or low reliability and quality. A phone, oven, couch, or even bedsheet won&#039;t last as long and therefore will need to be purchased more frequently. Linens, dishware, cooking utensils and so forth used to last effectively forever. People would hand them down. My parents first couch lasted 40 years before they chose to replace it. Our couch lasted three before literally falling to pieces.

I agree that bills like cable, cell phone, etc. are extra expenses that didn&#039;t exist in the past however they are small in comparison to the major expenses that have increased the most.

So, three conclusions:

1. Do everything possible to keep the major costs of housing, transportation, health care, and education down as much as possible. Spend the effort there first, rather than worrying about your cell phone minutes.

2. Then expend the effort to find quality wherever possible. This is difficult as even paying more won&#039;t always work. You might have to buy old instead of new to get things that will last. But the less frequently you have to purchase basic needed items (no one will argue, I hope, that an oven, furniture, and basic housewares are necessities).

3. Then analyze the extras to see whether they are really needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our insurance agent sends us a birthday card every year that includes a flier listing the cost of items the year we were born versus the cost of items now &#8212; along with the average income (we are in our late 30s). One day I ran the numbers and determined the following:</p>
<p>Consumer goods and commodities are the same or less relative to average income. A gallon of milk now costs the same as back then &#8212; as a percent of what people made.</p>
<p>The two listed exceptions:</p>
<p>Housing<br />
Automobiles</p>
<p>Which were both an order of magnitude higher compared to income. To that list I think we can agree to add college tuition and health care.</p>
<p>Naturally the modern &#8220;average&#8221; home or car is bigger/safer/fancier than back then. Still there&#8217;s no doubt that even a basic house or car costs much more than it did three decades ago.</p>
<p>In addition, I would argue that consumer items have to be purchased more frequently now due to planned obsolescence and / or low reliability and quality. A phone, oven, couch, or even bedsheet won&#8217;t last as long and therefore will need to be purchased more frequently. Linens, dishware, cooking utensils and so forth used to last effectively forever. People would hand them down. My parents first couch lasted 40 years before they chose to replace it. Our couch lasted three before literally falling to pieces.</p>
<p>I agree that bills like cable, cell phone, etc. are extra expenses that didn&#8217;t exist in the past however they are small in comparison to the major expenses that have increased the most.</p>
<p>So, three conclusions:</p>
<p>1. Do everything possible to keep the major costs of housing, transportation, health care, and education down as much as possible. Spend the effort there first, rather than worrying about your cell phone minutes.</p>
<p>2. Then expend the effort to find quality wherever possible. This is difficult as even paying more won&#8217;t always work. You might have to buy old instead of new to get things that will last. But the less frequently you have to purchase basic needed items (no one will argue, I hope, that an oven, furniture, and basic housewares are necessities).</p>
<p>3. Then analyze the extras to see whether they are really needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-506085</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-506085</guid>
		<description>One thing I do like about this post is the emphasis on the idea that you could give up certain expenses if needed. I know a family who literally went bankrupt and lost their house, but never had their satellite tv shut off, never had their internet shut off or downgraded service, and still had both landline and cell phone services. Pretty stupid, if you ask me. But to them, they &quot;needed&quot; these things and they were &quot;bills,&quot; not luxuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I do like about this post is the emphasis on the idea that you could give up certain expenses if needed. I know a family who literally went bankrupt and lost their house, but never had their satellite tv shut off, never had their internet shut off or downgraded service, and still had both landline and cell phone services. Pretty stupid, if you ask me. But to them, they &#8220;needed&#8221; these things and they were &#8220;bills,&#8221; not luxuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505893</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505893</guid>
		<description>I live in the UK, where the equation is somewhat different (though not vastly different); here it&#039;s very clear that housing costs are a major issue. I have a book &quot;Schott&#039;s Almanac&quot; with a wonderful graph in it showing the problem very accurately. In 1986, the cost of the average home in the UK was 2.8x the average salary in the UK. In 2007, the cost of the average home in the UK was 7x the average salary in the UK.

Essentially what this means is that if you want to live in an average home, you need to earn a substantially above average salary, and you probably need both partners to be working. My parents bought their house in 1973, and keep telling me &quot;it was terrible, in the 1970s mortgage rates went so high we had hardly any money left for food&quot;. And I reply &quot;but at least you were able to get a mortgage for 3x my dad&#039;s salary and that bought you a three-bed house with a garden!&quot; 3x the average salary in the UK would barely buy you a one-bed apartment now.

We&#039;ve been in this weird situation where you need a vast amount of income to buy an average house, but your monthly payments were actually fairly low (this is of course what tempted a lot of people to lie about their annual income to get a mortgage; they only looked at the &#039;monthly payment&#039; and saw it was affordable). It means that many families have a large mortgage, the two-incomes they needed to get that mortgage, but lots of disposable cash because they&#039;re doing the equivalent of &#039;making the minimum payment on your card&#039; on their mortgage every month. 

It&#039;s not that the many little luxuries are what&#039;s causing us to need two working parents. Families need to have two working parents to get the mortgage, and then find that - unless they&#039;re disciplined and pour all their spare cash into paying down the mortgage quickly - they fall into spending their extra income on little luxuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the UK, where the equation is somewhat different (though not vastly different); here it&#8217;s very clear that housing costs are a major issue. I have a book &#8220;Schott&#8217;s Almanac&#8221; with a wonderful graph in it showing the problem very accurately. In 1986, the cost of the average home in the UK was 2.8x the average salary in the UK. In 2007, the cost of the average home in the UK was 7x the average salary in the UK.</p>
<p>Essentially what this means is that if you want to live in an average home, you need to earn a substantially above average salary, and you probably need both partners to be working. My parents bought their house in 1973, and keep telling me &#8220;it was terrible, in the 1970s mortgage rates went so high we had hardly any money left for food&#8221;. And I reply &#8220;but at least you were able to get a mortgage for 3x my dad&#8217;s salary and that bought you a three-bed house with a garden!&#8221; 3x the average salary in the UK would barely buy you a one-bed apartment now.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been in this weird situation where you need a vast amount of income to buy an average house, but your monthly payments were actually fairly low (this is of course what tempted a lot of people to lie about their annual income to get a mortgage; they only looked at the &#8216;monthly payment&#8217; and saw it was affordable). It means that many families have a large mortgage, the two-incomes they needed to get that mortgage, but lots of disposable cash because they&#8217;re doing the equivalent of &#8216;making the minimum payment on your card&#8217; on their mortgage every month. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that the many little luxuries are what&#8217;s causing us to need two working parents. Families need to have two working parents to get the mortgage, and then find that &#8211; unless they&#8217;re disciplined and pour all their spare cash into paying down the mortgage quickly &#8211; they fall into spending their extra income on little luxuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505665</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505665</guid>
		<description>The more I think about this, the more I have to say.  What is really galling is that even with these tremendous increases in revenue that the government is garnering at our expense, they spend soooo much more than that.  With a $10 trillion deficit (or 10,000 billion, or 10 million million to add a little perspective), the prospects of this burden decreasing in the future for us or our kids is just about zippity do dah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about this, the more I have to say.  What is really galling is that even with these tremendous increases in revenue that the government is garnering at our expense, they spend soooo much more than that.  With a $10 trillion deficit (or 10,000 billion, or 10 million million to add a little perspective), the prospects of this burden decreasing in the future for us or our kids is just about zippity do dah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505648</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505648</guid>
		<description>I did some more cyphering related to my previous comment (#58).  If you account for inflation, that $534 per person in revenue per year in 1962 grows to about $3600 per year in 2006 -- much less that the $8000 that the government actually raked in that year.  So inflation does not come close to explaining the increase.  In fact, since we pay for corporate taxes in the cost of goods and services, it seems that increasing taxes is in itself inflationary.  By the way corporate tax revenues increased from about $21 billion in 1962, to almost $838 billion in 2006 -- an increase of almost 40 fold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some more cyphering related to my previous comment (#58).  If you account for inflation, that $534 per person in revenue per year in 1962 grows to about $3600 per year in 2006 &#8212; much less that the $8000 that the government actually raked in that year.  So inflation does not come close to explaining the increase.  In fact, since we pay for corporate taxes in the cost of goods and services, it seems that increasing taxes is in itself inflationary.  By the way corporate tax revenues increased from about $21 billion in 1962, to almost $838 billion in 2006 &#8212; an increase of almost 40 fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505619</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505619</guid>
		<description>What is surprising in the comments is the lack of focus on the effect of increasing taxes.  In comparison, most everything else is pretty much background noise.  If you look at the data from the government website http://www.gpoaccess.gov/USbudget/fy08/hist.html
you can see that Federal Goverment revenue per person has increased from about $534 per year in 1962, to about $8000 per year in 2006.  The main sources of this revenue are individual and corporate income taxes and Social Security taxes, all of which we either directly or indirectly pay for. 

There has been some lament that the days of the single-parent breadwinner are gone.  This did not happen because we want more stuff, but instead so that we can pay our crushing tax burden.  It&#039;s especially insidious to have to pay for child care so that both parents can work to achieve this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is surprising in the comments is the lack of focus on the effect of increasing taxes.  In comparison, most everything else is pretty much background noise.  If you look at the data from the government website <a href="http://www.gpoaccess.gov/USbudget/fy08/hist.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gpoaccess.gov/USbudget/fy08/hist.html</a><br />
you can see that Federal Goverment revenue per person has increased from about $534 per year in 1962, to about $8000 per year in 2006.  The main sources of this revenue are individual and corporate income taxes and Social Security taxes, all of which we either directly or indirectly pay for. </p>
<p>There has been some lament that the days of the single-parent breadwinner are gone.  This did not happen because we want more stuff, but instead so that we can pay our crushing tax burden.  It&#8217;s especially insidious to have to pay for child care so that both parents can work to achieve this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505568</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505568</guid>
		<description>In addition to the increase in bills, families face increased federal and state income taxes.  The increase in the tax rates forced many families to add a second income.  All of the &quot;luxuries&quot; came along when families saw a loss of their free time because of career requirements.  When one spouse/partner is able to stay home and take care of daily family matters, the evening is freed up to spend time being a family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the increase in bills, families face increased federal and state income taxes.  The increase in the tax rates forced many families to add a second income.  All of the &#8220;luxuries&#8221; came along when families saw a loss of their free time because of career requirements.  When one spouse/partner is able to stay home and take care of daily family matters, the evening is freed up to spend time being a family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505449</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505449</guid>
		<description>My husband and I live in a very expensive area of the country and are at the moment living on one income.  We&#039;ve had several incidents where emergencies with our car, with unexpected tax expenses have come up.   I resent the statement that a few folks have made here about it is the doing without the luxuries.  We do not have cable, we borrow extensively from the library, we eat in, don&#039;t go on expensive vacations, etc. It is stressful living like this.  I would give anything not to have this feeling.   I am sure I am not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I live in a very expensive area of the country and are at the moment living on one income.  We&#8217;ve had several incidents where emergencies with our car, with unexpected tax expenses have come up.   I resent the statement that a few folks have made here about it is the doing without the luxuries.  We do not have cable, we borrow extensively from the library, we eat in, don&#8217;t go on expensive vacations, etc. It is stressful living like this.  I would give anything not to have this feeling.   I am sure I am not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505435</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505435</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give up all of my &quot;luxuries&quot;, just to go back to the days of stay-at-home moms, safety for our children to play outside unsupervised, and the ability to have affordable foods that are not processed with added chemicals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give up all of my &#8220;luxuries&#8221;, just to go back to the days of stay-at-home moms, safety for our children to play outside unsupervised, and the ability to have affordable foods that are not processed with added chemicals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505314</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505314</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t just the expenses, it is the possessions.  An elderly friend of mine was raised (along with 9 siblings) in a 900 square foot home, that she lived in into her 70s.  Friends come to visit us and are surprised to find us living in 2000 square feet, which seemed more than adequate until the parents moved in and one of the kids moved back home.  Still, it will have to BE adequate.  

The couch my parents bought they kept for 30 years.  They drove the same car for 23 years.  I don&#039;t remember clothes coming from a store until I was in my teens and started buying my own.  Maybe an occasional thing from Sears or the Penneys catalog.

I don&#039;t think we ever had a new appliance, nor did we have a ton of kitchen gadgets.

When my husband and I got married we didn&#039;t own an electric can opener, a blender, a mixer, an electric coffee maker or a TV.  This was in the early 80s!  Our friends thought it was nuts, but I was able to bake bread, whip cream, etc., etc. with a spoon, a whisk, a bowl and a lot of elbow grease.

Now I have become addicted to my conveniences.  I don&#039;t use my bread machine because I prefer the touch method for testing dough, and prefer the texture and shape of loaves I make by hand, though I am not averse to starting the process in my kitchenaid.

My husband doesn&#039;t remember shaving with a straight razor, but I do.  Now we are told that a triple or even quad razor blade isn&#039;t enough, but that we need 5 blades to get the job done.

Along with the conveniences I think we have lost some of the pleasures of life.  I have to maintain a printer, computer, router, laptop, stereo, direct TV, dvd player(s), cell phones, etc., etc., etc.  My dog doesn&#039;t need merely to eat dog food, but to have special diet food, regular vet visits complete with blood work that cost more than most developing countries spend on a human in a year.  When I was a kid a dog was a &lt;i&gt;dog&lt;/i&gt;, and while we took care of them, no one thought of replacing a canine hip or some of the other procedures formerly reserved for humans.

Although I resist the big screen HD tv thing, the Ipod, the BlueRay, the texting, etc., I find somethings have become a requirement simply because of the change in the world around me.  For instance, I could no longer resist cell phones when the pay phones began disappearing.  Vehicles are nearly impossible to maintain and repair on your own anymore due to the computerization of components.

Also, for the most part, things aren&#039;t built to last.  Case in point--Bell Telephones.  If you have an old Bell phone, you still likely have a working model but you&#039;ll have to pay more for a rotary line.  I average a cell phone a year.  They simply aren&#039;t built for the long term.  Some of this is our own fault.  We have become a Wal-Mart culture, and either we don&#039;t know how to spot quality in the items we purchase or we don&#039;t care.  

In some things it is virtually impossible to find a product built to last.  My precious Levi jeans used to be dynamos.  They fit right, were constructed well and lasted for years.  A couple of years ago, they changed my Levis.  Now they are a different cut and instead of being heavy-duty, now include Spandex and are much lighterweight material.  My last pair (for which I paid the ordinary price after searching in vain for ones made the old way) wore out in less than 4 months!  Completely unacceptable.

Now that most of my friends and relations are online, and now that many, if not most, jobs are posted online it is difficult to avoid internet service.  How does one stay connected to the phone phobic, email-manic world otherwise?  Even my church sends its information not through phone chains as was done when I was a kid, but almost exclusively through email.

The point of this is that, as others have pointed out, we do have expenses our parents didn&#039;t have, and some of them we don&#039;t have a lot of control of.  For me, however, I am learning to research things better.  I pay a higher price for my internet service, but I use a local company, which is something I highly value.  I do make every attempt to ensure that clothing I purchase has lasting value, and am searching for a replacement for my Levis(sniff).  I research how a car is built, and study designs so that I am purchasing classics that fit into my esthetic but also will not be &quot;out of style&quot; in no time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t just the expenses, it is the possessions.  An elderly friend of mine was raised (along with 9 siblings) in a 900 square foot home, that she lived in into her 70s.  Friends come to visit us and are surprised to find us living in 2000 square feet, which seemed more than adequate until the parents moved in and one of the kids moved back home.  Still, it will have to BE adequate.  </p>
<p>The couch my parents bought they kept for 30 years.  They drove the same car for 23 years.  I don&#8217;t remember clothes coming from a store until I was in my teens and started buying my own.  Maybe an occasional thing from Sears or the Penneys catalog.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we ever had a new appliance, nor did we have a ton of kitchen gadgets.</p>
<p>When my husband and I got married we didn&#8217;t own an electric can opener, a blender, a mixer, an electric coffee maker or a TV.  This was in the early 80s!  Our friends thought it was nuts, but I was able to bake bread, whip cream, etc., etc. with a spoon, a whisk, a bowl and a lot of elbow grease.</p>
<p>Now I have become addicted to my conveniences.  I don&#8217;t use my bread machine because I prefer the touch method for testing dough, and prefer the texture and shape of loaves I make by hand, though I am not averse to starting the process in my kitchenaid.</p>
<p>My husband doesn&#8217;t remember shaving with a straight razor, but I do.  Now we are told that a triple or even quad razor blade isn&#8217;t enough, but that we need 5 blades to get the job done.</p>
<p>Along with the conveniences I think we have lost some of the pleasures of life.  I have to maintain a printer, computer, router, laptop, stereo, direct TV, dvd player(s), cell phones, etc., etc., etc.  My dog doesn&#8217;t need merely to eat dog food, but to have special diet food, regular vet visits complete with blood work that cost more than most developing countries spend on a human in a year.  When I was a kid a dog was a <i>dog</i>, and while we took care of them, no one thought of replacing a canine hip or some of the other procedures formerly reserved for humans.</p>
<p>Although I resist the big screen HD tv thing, the Ipod, the BlueRay, the texting, etc., I find somethings have become a requirement simply because of the change in the world around me.  For instance, I could no longer resist cell phones when the pay phones began disappearing.  Vehicles are nearly impossible to maintain and repair on your own anymore due to the computerization of components.</p>
<p>Also, for the most part, things aren&#8217;t built to last.  Case in point&#8211;Bell Telephones.  If you have an old Bell phone, you still likely have a working model but you&#8217;ll have to pay more for a rotary line.  I average a cell phone a year.  They simply aren&#8217;t built for the long term.  Some of this is our own fault.  We have become a Wal-Mart culture, and either we don&#8217;t know how to spot quality in the items we purchase or we don&#8217;t care.  </p>
<p>In some things it is virtually impossible to find a product built to last.  My precious Levi jeans used to be dynamos.  They fit right, were constructed well and lasted for years.  A couple of years ago, they changed my Levis.  Now they are a different cut and instead of being heavy-duty, now include Spandex and are much lighterweight material.  My last pair (for which I paid the ordinary price after searching in vain for ones made the old way) wore out in less than 4 months!  Completely unacceptable.</p>
<p>Now that most of my friends and relations are online, and now that many, if not most, jobs are posted online it is difficult to avoid internet service.  How does one stay connected to the phone phobic, email-manic world otherwise?  Even my church sends its information not through phone chains as was done when I was a kid, but almost exclusively through email.</p>
<p>The point of this is that, as others have pointed out, we do have expenses our parents didn&#8217;t have, and some of them we don&#8217;t have a lot of control of.  For me, however, I am learning to research things better.  I pay a higher price for my internet service, but I use a local company, which is something I highly value.  I do make every attempt to ensure that clothing I purchase has lasting value, and am searching for a replacement for my Levis(sniff).  I research how a car is built, and study designs so that I am purchasing classics that fit into my esthetic but also will not be &#8220;out of style&#8221; in no time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505285</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505285</guid>
		<description>Just a comment about wells/septic tanks.  Sure you don&#039;t have month to month bills, but digging a well can cost well over $10,000, and no guarantee that they will come up with water.  Even if you have a well, if something happens to the pump, you are looking at several hundred dollars to replace it, and that&#039;s assuming you can do it yourself (not to mention the fun if the problems happen, as they invariably do for us, when it is -30 to -40C).  My moms well collapsed a couple winters ago, and because it was winter, she was hauling water for months.  She said she didn&#039;t mind because she had grown up without running water, but I would have lost my mind with my three little kids.  Septic tank -- there is that annual bill to have it pumped out, and they also have to eventually be replaced.  Right before we bought our place from my mom, she replaced the septic tank to the tune of $5000, I think.  Hopefully that will last us another 20 years, but still not free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a comment about wells/septic tanks.  Sure you don&#8217;t have month to month bills, but digging a well can cost well over $10,000, and no guarantee that they will come up with water.  Even if you have a well, if something happens to the pump, you are looking at several hundred dollars to replace it, and that&#8217;s assuming you can do it yourself (not to mention the fun if the problems happen, as they invariably do for us, when it is -30 to -40C).  My moms well collapsed a couple winters ago, and because it was winter, she was hauling water for months.  She said she didn&#8217;t mind because she had grown up without running water, but I would have lost my mind with my three little kids.  Septic tank &#8212; there is that annual bill to have it pumped out, and they also have to eventually be replaced.  Right before we bought our place from my mom, she replaced the septic tank to the tune of $5000, I think.  Hopefully that will last us another 20 years, but still not free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505215</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505215</guid>
		<description>Good post Trent, definitely makes you think.

With technology comes convenience, at a cost. One or two hundred years ago, one would have virtually no bills at all. Perhaps a small property tax and a church tithe, but that&#039;s about it. The thought of paying for electricity or cable would have been unthinkable, because it didn&#039;t exist. That generation didn&#039;t make that choice, they used what was available to them at the time and by their means. I have a hard time thinking we&#039;re slaves of technology, because my parents simply didn&#039;t have the technology available to them. Sure they didn&#039;t have the internet, because the internet didn&#039;t exist. But my great-grandparents didn&#039;t have a phone bill, because that didn&#039;t exist. Their great grandparents didn&#039;t cable, electric, water, or sewage bills, because virtually all of those things didn&#039;t exist in the capacity we know them today.

I don&#039;t know, this post rings all sorts of opposite emotions for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Trent, definitely makes you think.</p>
<p>With technology comes convenience, at a cost. One or two hundred years ago, one would have virtually no bills at all. Perhaps a small property tax and a church tithe, but that&#8217;s about it. The thought of paying for electricity or cable would have been unthinkable, because it didn&#8217;t exist. That generation didn&#8217;t make that choice, they used what was available to them at the time and by their means. I have a hard time thinking we&#8217;re slaves of technology, because my parents simply didn&#8217;t have the technology available to them. Sure they didn&#8217;t have the internet, because the internet didn&#8217;t exist. But my great-grandparents didn&#8217;t have a phone bill, because that didn&#8217;t exist. Their great grandparents didn&#8217;t cable, electric, water, or sewage bills, because virtually all of those things didn&#8217;t exist in the capacity we know them today.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, this post rings all sorts of opposite emotions for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505189</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505189</guid>
		<description>I find some of the posts regarding how our parents and grandparents fared don&#039;t seem to fit with what I remember.  My family lived in Midwestern small towns, so the cost of living was much, much less.  But both my parents and my grandparents lived in 1600-2000 sq foot, 100-150 year old houses, some with 2 bathrooms, on at least a 1/4 acre in town.  We kids didn&#039;t need to share a room, and we had a couple of spare rooms in the house. Both had 2 cars, but my grandma almost never drove out of town, so it didn&#039;t cost her much (I&#039;m sure they were bought used).  My parents, however, put 50k miles a year on theirs working in the city.

What I find has contributed to my *choices* that cost me more money are primarily that:

a) I did not want to live in the same small town, so I am now paying 10-15x what my mom did (in 1970&#039;s dollars) for a house in the &#039;burbs (in today&#039;s dollars, the suburban 10 year old house values at 6-8x what her old small town one does), 

b) college is generally expected of our generation, so I am the proud owner of five-figures&#039; worth of student loan debt, 

c) we can&#039;t (and I wouldn&#039;t anyway) work on the car in the front yard like my grandpa did- both because the city doesn&#039;t allow it and because today&#039;s cars don&#039;t facilitate it the same way,

d) I refuse to use oleo on my toast or feed my kids most of the inexpensive HFCS-filled or processed foods (of course, food is so much cheaper for us than it was for them as a percentage of income).  I also don&#039;t have the temperament or weather for a full-yard garden to help with produce,

e) I pay a ton for good health insurance, full coverage for my cars, homeowner&#039;s insurance (remember in grade school- the kid whose house burned down and they just lost everything? No one had homeowner&#039;s or renter&#039;s insurance then), enough life insurance to make sure my kids can still go to college, and a chunk in to my 401-k.  All things my parents didn&#039;t have to deal with or couldn&#039;t think to afford.

So a lot of the reasons we spend more money are because of conscious choices, obligations our parents didn&#039;t have, and- like everyone else has mentioned- the little luxuries we consider necessary now (like internet access).  Incidentally, my parents also consider internet access necessary now, so it&#039;s not just a generational thing, it&#039;s keeping up with the times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find some of the posts regarding how our parents and grandparents fared don&#8217;t seem to fit with what I remember.  My family lived in Midwestern small towns, so the cost of living was much, much less.  But both my parents and my grandparents lived in 1600-2000 sq foot, 100-150 year old houses, some with 2 bathrooms, on at least a 1/4 acre in town.  We kids didn&#8217;t need to share a room, and we had a couple of spare rooms in the house. Both had 2 cars, but my grandma almost never drove out of town, so it didn&#8217;t cost her much (I&#8217;m sure they were bought used).  My parents, however, put 50k miles a year on theirs working in the city.</p>
<p>What I find has contributed to my *choices* that cost me more money are primarily that:</p>
<p>a) I did not want to live in the same small town, so I am now paying 10-15x what my mom did (in 1970&#8242;s dollars) for a house in the &#8216;burbs (in today&#8217;s dollars, the suburban 10 year old house values at 6-8x what her old small town one does), </p>
<p>b) college is generally expected of our generation, so I am the proud owner of five-figures&#8217; worth of student loan debt, </p>
<p>c) we can&#8217;t (and I wouldn&#8217;t anyway) work on the car in the front yard like my grandpa did- both because the city doesn&#8217;t allow it and because today&#8217;s cars don&#8217;t facilitate it the same way,</p>
<p>d) I refuse to use oleo on my toast or feed my kids most of the inexpensive HFCS-filled or processed foods (of course, food is so much cheaper for us than it was for them as a percentage of income).  I also don&#8217;t have the temperament or weather for a full-yard garden to help with produce,</p>
<p>e) I pay a ton for good health insurance, full coverage for my cars, homeowner&#8217;s insurance (remember in grade school- the kid whose house burned down and they just lost everything? No one had homeowner&#8217;s or renter&#8217;s insurance then), enough life insurance to make sure my kids can still go to college, and a chunk in to my 401-k.  All things my parents didn&#8217;t have to deal with or couldn&#8217;t think to afford.</p>
<p>So a lot of the reasons we spend more money are because of conscious choices, obligations our parents didn&#8217;t have, and- like everyone else has mentioned- the little luxuries we consider necessary now (like internet access).  Incidentally, my parents also consider internet access necessary now, so it&#8217;s not just a generational thing, it&#8217;s keeping up with the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/02/01/the-bills-your-parents-didnt-have/comment-page-2/#comment-505172</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3098#comment-505172</guid>
		<description>This has obviously generated a lot of conversation. The best write and explanation for the differences between our parents lives and ours that I have ever seen can be found in The Two-Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren, Amelia Warren Tyagi 2004. Check it out (from your local library) it is very readable. Comment 15, this is where the statistics are coming from.

I think Comments 25 and 52 are great also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has obviously generated a lot of conversation. The best write and explanation for the differences between our parents lives and ours that I have ever seen can be found in The Two-Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren, Amelia Warren Tyagi 2004. Check it out (from your local library) it is very readable. Comment 15, this is where the statistics are coming from.</p>
<p>I think Comments 25 and 52 are great also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

