<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reader Mailbag #63</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/</link>
	<description>Simple, applicable personal finance advice for the modern world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:22:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-670204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-670204</guid>
		<description>Here is an update on the car situation. My girlfriend has no money. The question the insurance company wants answered is: where does she live. If it&#039;s with me then they will not cover. If she lives somewhere else then they might cover. The answer is that it depends. My agent suggested getting a lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an update on the car situation. My girlfriend has no money. The question the insurance company wants answered is: where does she live. If it&#8217;s with me then they will not cover. If she lives somewhere else then they might cover. The answer is that it depends. My agent suggested getting a lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon`</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-669792</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-669792</guid>
		<description>Trent,

I do love your blog. Maybe because your advice is often just plain Midwestern good sense and I am from Iowa, too. 

What I don&#039;t love is all the attention paid to the people who want to call you &quot;self-righteous&quot;. Please just ignore them. If they don&#039;t like the blog, nobody&#039;s forcing them to read it. When my husband was working retail, they had the 80/20 rule, which basically means that if 20% or less of the feedback you get is negative, you&#039;re doing fine. It seems that 20% or so just LIKE to complain. My humble opinion: Don&#039;t feed the beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent,</p>
<p>I do love your blog. Maybe because your advice is often just plain Midwestern good sense and I am from Iowa, too. </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t love is all the attention paid to the people who want to call you &#8220;self-righteous&#8221;. Please just ignore them. If they don&#8217;t like the blog, nobody&#8217;s forcing them to read it. When my husband was working retail, they had the 80/20 rule, which basically means that if 20% or less of the feedback you get is negative, you&#8217;re doing fine. It seems that 20% or so just LIKE to complain. My humble opinion: Don&#8217;t feed the beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-669431</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-669431</guid>
		<description>To Michelle (comment #87): MSN&#039;s website has some advice on buying health insurance.

Go to msn.com and click on the Money section, then click Personal Finance, then click on Insurance. Once you&#039;re in the Insurance section, scroll down to &quot;Save on health insurance&quot; for more tips. I suggest starting with the &quot;5-minute guide&quot; to health insurance article. 

Here&#039;s the direct link to the &quot;5-minute&quot; article:
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourHealth/Your5MinuteGuideToHealthInsurance.aspx

I hope this helps and good luck with finding health insurance and with all your future plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Michelle (comment #87): MSN&#8217;s website has some advice on buying health insurance.</p>
<p>Go to msn.com and click on the Money section, then click Personal Finance, then click on Insurance. Once you&#8217;re in the Insurance section, scroll down to &#8220;Save on health insurance&#8221; for more tips. I suggest starting with the &#8220;5-minute guide&#8221; to health insurance article. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the direct link to the &#8220;5-minute&#8221; article:<br />
<a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourHealth/Your5MinuteGuideToHealthInsurance.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourHealth/Your5MinuteGuideToHealthInsurance.aspx</a></p>
<p>I hope this helps and good luck with finding health insurance and with all your future plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-668656</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-668656</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note about privacy. As a former Creative director, I saw many talented photographers give up and get day jobs because images are too easily downloaded for free. It makes it very hard for new talent to make a living. Rather than encourage creativity, all prating does is stifle potential new voices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note about privacy. As a former Creative director, I saw many talented photographers give up and get day jobs because images are too easily downloaded for free. It makes it very hard for new talent to make a living. Rather than encourage creativity, all prating does is stifle potential new voices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tentaculistic</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-668087</link>
		<dc:creator>tentaculistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-668087</guid>
		<description>Debt collection - I got a call like this in January, a debt collections agency that said I owed $51 for a 2008 treatment... and somehow all the letters they claimed to have sent to my address I had left in 2006 weren&#039;t getting through.  I freaked out of course (collections!!), then asked for and wrote down 1- her company name, 2- her name, 3- her phone number, 4- her company&#039;s phone number (so I could Google it), 5- the date and location of service, 6- details of service, and 7- exact amount owed.  She seemed disconcerted by my asking for that kind of information, which made me really suspicious.  

The company name and phone info matched on Google, and more importantly the hospital agreed that it was their collections agency.  I called back and asked for a written bill to be sent to me, which she did (and put a hold on my account so it wouldn&#039;t affect my credit), and after checking out the bill I went ahead and paid it.  But I&#039;m glad to see that I wasn&#039;t improperly suspicious!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debt collection &#8211; I got a call like this in January, a debt collections agency that said I owed $51 for a 2008 treatment&#8230; and somehow all the letters they claimed to have sent to my address I had left in 2006 weren&#8217;t getting through.  I freaked out of course (collections!!), then asked for and wrote down 1- her company name, 2- her name, 3- her phone number, 4- her company&#8217;s phone number (so I could Google it), 5- the date and location of service, 6- details of service, and 7- exact amount owed.  She seemed disconcerted by my asking for that kind of information, which made me really suspicious.  </p>
<p>The company name and phone info matched on Google, and more importantly the hospital agreed that it was their collections agency.  I called back and asked for a written bill to be sent to me, which she did (and put a hold on my account so it wouldn&#8217;t affect my credit), and after checking out the bill I went ahead and paid it.  But I&#8217;m glad to see that I wasn&#8217;t improperly suspicious!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tentaculistic</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-668070</link>
		<dc:creator>tentaculistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-668070</guid>
		<description>I totally used Home Buying for Dummies too, and found it extremely useful.  I bought/rented several other ones, but kept coming back to the Dummies book.  It got dog-eared, highlighted, and all marked up, but I knew all the questions to ask (which didn&#039;t always make the realtors happy) and basically took charge of the process from beginning to end.  Great book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally used Home Buying for Dummies too, and found it extremely useful.  I bought/rented several other ones, but kept coming back to the Dummies book.  It got dog-eared, highlighted, and all marked up, but I knew all the questions to ask (which didn&#8217;t always make the realtors happy) and basically took charge of the process from beginning to end.  Great book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667911</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667911</guid>
		<description>Hi Trent, I&#039;m a very recent college graduate, and the prospect of job searching right now, in addition to getting health insurance is pretty scary right now. Could you link any articles or books that I could take out from the library explaining health insurance in plain English, for someone like me with no experience with this stuff? 

I&#039;m not sure whether I should be trying for single payer health insurance, or wait until I have a job. My state (NY) doesn&#039;t seem to have any temporary insurance, according to the websites I&#039;ve looked at, but I&#039;m not sure how to tell which website is the real deal, and which one isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trent, I&#8217;m a very recent college graduate, and the prospect of job searching right now, in addition to getting health insurance is pretty scary right now. Could you link any articles or books that I could take out from the library explaining health insurance in plain English, for someone like me with no experience with this stuff? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether I should be trying for single payer health insurance, or wait until I have a job. My state (NY) doesn&#8217;t seem to have any temporary insurance, according to the websites I&#8217;ve looked at, but I&#8217;m not sure how to tell which website is the real deal, and which one isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667668</guid>
		<description>Allied Interstate is an unlicenced collection agency operating out of Fish Lake, Nevada.  You can go on complaints.com to check out all the complaints about them.  You do not want to deal with them or give them any money.  I checked them out because we were getting three calls a day starting at 8 am from them for about six weeks.  No one was there, these were auto-dial harrassment calls.  We have no outstanding debts and are on the no call registry which made the calls all that more annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allied Interstate is an unlicenced collection agency operating out of Fish Lake, Nevada.  You can go on complaints.com to check out all the complaints about them.  You do not want to deal with them or give them any money.  I checked them out because we were getting three calls a day starting at 8 am from them for about six weeks.  No one was there, these were auto-dial harrassment calls.  We have no outstanding debts and are on the no call registry which made the calls all that more annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667517</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667517</guid>
		<description>I have a question for Trent and for any simple dollar readers out there. 

I just got my monthly statement from my credit card company, stating that my minimum payment due this month is &quot;$0&quot;. I currently have a balance of about $1,500 on this card. 

Even though money is &quot;tight right now, I would really like to start putting away small amounts of money into a savings account and then focus on paying down my credit card. 

My question is: Should I take the $50 that I normally pay per month on this card and put it toward my savings or should I just pay $50 to my credit card company this month as usual?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for Trent and for any simple dollar readers out there. </p>
<p>I just got my monthly statement from my credit card company, stating that my minimum payment due this month is &#8220;$0&#8243;. I currently have a balance of about $1,500 on this card. </p>
<p>Even though money is &#8220;tight right now, I would really like to start putting away small amounts of money into a savings account and then focus on paying down my credit card. </p>
<p>My question is: Should I take the $50 that I normally pay per month on this card and put it toward my savings or should I just pay $50 to my credit card company this month as usual?</p>
<p>Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667380</guid>
		<description>Re: Paul and The hospital debt.  

It sounds to me like you are being contacted by a scavenger collection agency.  If your debt is past the statute of limitations, it is against the law for this agency to try and collect it.  If you do send them money, this will reopen and reaffirm the debt and this delinquent debt will stay on your DW&#039;s credit report for another seven years or whatever the statute of limitations on debts are in your state (in mine it&#039;s seven years) and it will negatively affect her credit score.  

What you need to do is send them a registered &quot;drop dead&quot; letter telling them not to contact you.  I would also request in the letter that they provide you written proof of this debt that they allege you owe.  If they are reputable and the debt is legitimate, they will do as you ask.  Scavenger agencies will not do this.  You have rights under the Fair Debt Collection Act and scavenger collection agencies take advantage of the fact that most people do not know what their rights are and they use illegal tactics and intimidation to collect on debts that they have no legal right to collect.

Just because a collection agency claims you owe money, doesn&#039;t mean you should immediately cut them a check.  My DH was harassed by a scavenger agency who claimed that he owed money on a store credit card that had been closed years ago that was paid in full and had no balance when he closed it.  

Scavenger collection agencies are the WORST.  They have no regard for the law, either.  Collection agencies have to follow the Fair Debt Collection act.

Do you have it in writing that the original hospital debt was forgiven?  The hospital should have given you something that stated the debt was forgiven and you do not owe them money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Paul and The hospital debt.  </p>
<p>It sounds to me like you are being contacted by a scavenger collection agency.  If your debt is past the statute of limitations, it is against the law for this agency to try and collect it.  If you do send them money, this will reopen and reaffirm the debt and this delinquent debt will stay on your DW&#8217;s credit report for another seven years or whatever the statute of limitations on debts are in your state (in mine it&#8217;s seven years) and it will negatively affect her credit score.  </p>
<p>What you need to do is send them a registered &#8220;drop dead&#8221; letter telling them not to contact you.  I would also request in the letter that they provide you written proof of this debt that they allege you owe.  If they are reputable and the debt is legitimate, they will do as you ask.  Scavenger agencies will not do this.  You have rights under the Fair Debt Collection Act and scavenger collection agencies take advantage of the fact that most people do not know what their rights are and they use illegal tactics and intimidation to collect on debts that they have no legal right to collect.</p>
<p>Just because a collection agency claims you owe money, doesn&#8217;t mean you should immediately cut them a check.  My DH was harassed by a scavenger agency who claimed that he owed money on a store credit card that had been closed years ago that was paid in full and had no balance when he closed it.  </p>
<p>Scavenger collection agencies are the WORST.  They have no regard for the law, either.  Collection agencies have to follow the Fair Debt Collection act.</p>
<p>Do you have it in writing that the original hospital debt was forgiven?  The hospital should have given you something that stated the debt was forgiven and you do not owe them money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no_sked</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667300</link>
		<dc:creator>no_sked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667300</guid>
		<description>hospital balance: it was nice of the hospital to forgive the debt several years ago but unfortunately it has come back to haunt you.  if you don&#039;t pay it now, then it will cost you atleast that much in time/resources to fight it and the stupid issue will probably resurface in another decade.  just pay it, get the documentation to prove it, and be done.  you will sleep better at night and get a few less gray hairs... that&#039;s worth more than $450 ;)

mystery shopping- i have been doing so for several years and it&#039;s not a waste of time.  however, i do not see it as a way to make a little extra money.  i do things that i normally do [or maybe do things that i would have to splurge on] and just alter my plan slightly to complete the mystery shopping.  
example #1: get the oil changed in my car for &quot;free&quot; instead of paying $30-40 out-of-pocket or listening to my hubsand cuss while he does it.
example #2: treat my daughter to a popular smoothie instead of paying $3-5.  
mystery shopping can be a way to avoid paying for a product/service that normally costs more than i&#039;m willing to pay;  i choose shop evaluations are not difficult or overly time consuming.  to me, it&#039;s not much different than using coupons, which is a nominal time investment to avoid spending a significant amount.

&quot;spend avoidance&quot; is not the same as saving money! i think trent does a good job of spelling out the differences AND providing reasons and methods to do both effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hospital balance: it was nice of the hospital to forgive the debt several years ago but unfortunately it has come back to haunt you.  if you don&#8217;t pay it now, then it will cost you atleast that much in time/resources to fight it and the stupid issue will probably resurface in another decade.  just pay it, get the documentation to prove it, and be done.  you will sleep better at night and get a few less gray hairs&#8230; that&#8217;s worth more than $450 ;)</p>
<p>mystery shopping- i have been doing so for several years and it&#8217;s not a waste of time.  however, i do not see it as a way to make a little extra money.  i do things that i normally do [or maybe do things that i would have to splurge on] and just alter my plan slightly to complete the mystery shopping.<br />
example #1: get the oil changed in my car for &#8220;free&#8221; instead of paying $30-40 out-of-pocket or listening to my hubsand cuss while he does it.<br />
example #2: treat my daughter to a popular smoothie instead of paying $3-5.<br />
mystery shopping can be a way to avoid paying for a product/service that normally costs more than i&#8217;m willing to pay;  i choose shop evaluations are not difficult or overly time consuming.  to me, it&#8217;s not much different than using coupons, which is a nominal time investment to avoid spending a significant amount.</p>
<p>&#8220;spend avoidance&#8221; is not the same as saving money! i think trent does a good job of spelling out the differences AND providing reasons and methods to do both effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667205</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667205</guid>
		<description>My husband has been hospitalized a few times in the last several years.  At the time we had private insurance with a large co-pay and we discussed with the hospital a payment plan of $50 a month.  Of course there are two bills, one for hospital charges and one for doctor charges.  These are intrest free.  I also believe there is some law where you can pay a minimal charge for medical bills and so long as you pay every month they can&#039;t send you to collections.  Anyhow, we have one bill left for bout $350 and someone calls from the hospital suggesting it would be in our &quot;best interest&quot; to pay this balance off and that it is &quot;aging.&quot;  When confronted about the payment plan and asked about collections, etc he had no answer other that the above.  I think the hospital was just trying to get the money NOW instead of later.  I wish my husband had said...I&#039;ll pay now...50% of the balance.  Hey I want to get rid of it too but there is no point if it&#039;s interest free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband has been hospitalized a few times in the last several years.  At the time we had private insurance with a large co-pay and we discussed with the hospital a payment plan of $50 a month.  Of course there are two bills, one for hospital charges and one for doctor charges.  These are intrest free.  I also believe there is some law where you can pay a minimal charge for medical bills and so long as you pay every month they can&#8217;t send you to collections.  Anyhow, we have one bill left for bout $350 and someone calls from the hospital suggesting it would be in our &#8220;best interest&#8221; to pay this balance off and that it is &#8220;aging.&#8221;  When confronted about the payment plan and asked about collections, etc he had no answer other that the above.  I think the hospital was just trying to get the money NOW instead of later.  I wish my husband had said&#8230;I&#8217;ll pay now&#8230;50% of the balance.  Hey I want to get rid of it too but there is no point if it&#8217;s interest free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667079</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667079</guid>
		<description>Starting a Roth can kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Since you&#039;ve already paid taxes on the contributions you make, you can turn around and withdraw those contributions without taxes or penalty (just don&#039;t take out any capital gains or dividends). This means that the Roth is perfect to use as your emergency fund (if you can&#039;t swing doing both at once). Put your first few years&#039; contributions into a money market account so it&#039;s there if you really need it. And if you shop around, you can find one with a minimum that nearly ANYONE can afford. T. Rowe Price requires $50 per month (systematic purchase a.k.a. automatic bank draft). That is a whopping $12.50 per week. I think just about anyone with a steady income can afford that. T.R.P. is also efficiently priced: no sales charges or 12-b1 fees and low expense ratios (0.41% on their extended equity market index fund). Once you build up your account, transfer it to Vanguard. I actually kept my Roth w/ TRP because I&#039;m very happy with them. I also have a rollover IRA at Vanguard. Invest now people! Stocks are on sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting a Roth can kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Since you&#8217;ve already paid taxes on the contributions you make, you can turn around and withdraw those contributions without taxes or penalty (just don&#8217;t take out any capital gains or dividends). This means that the Roth is perfect to use as your emergency fund (if you can&#8217;t swing doing both at once). Put your first few years&#8217; contributions into a money market account so it&#8217;s there if you really need it. And if you shop around, you can find one with a minimum that nearly ANYONE can afford. T. Rowe Price requires $50 per month (systematic purchase a.k.a. automatic bank draft). That is a whopping $12.50 per week. I think just about anyone with a steady income can afford that. T.R.P. is also efficiently priced: no sales charges or 12-b1 fees and low expense ratios (0.41% on their extended equity market index fund). Once you build up your account, transfer it to Vanguard. I actually kept my Roth w/ TRP because I&#8217;m very happy with them. I also have a rollover IRA at Vanguard. Invest now people! Stocks are on sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister E</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667068</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about the &quot;no&quot; on the auto claim.

I work for an insurer (although not auto and in Canada not the US) and I assure you that they can&#039;t just deny coverage because they feel like it.  Insurance, particularly auto, is heavily regulated and generally applicable laws and judicial attitudes fall squarely on the insured&#039;s side, not the company&#039;s.  Even giving people &quot;the run around&quot; is very bad practice and certainly not done intentionally.  If an adjuster denies a claim that should be paid and the company is taken to court and forced to pay they will incur more costs then had they just paid the claim in the first place and can even earn government censure in some cases or further damages for breaching the idea of utmost good faith.  In all such cases their reputation would suffer.  I don&#039;t work on the claims side but I imagine that denying legitimate claims would be a good way to find yourself out of work.  Insurer&#039;s don&#039;t mind paying legitimate claims, that&#039;s what we do.

Were you in breach of policy conditions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about the &#8220;no&#8221; on the auto claim.</p>
<p>I work for an insurer (although not auto and in Canada not the US) and I assure you that they can&#8217;t just deny coverage because they feel like it.  Insurance, particularly auto, is heavily regulated and generally applicable laws and judicial attitudes fall squarely on the insured&#8217;s side, not the company&#8217;s.  Even giving people &#8220;the run around&#8221; is very bad practice and certainly not done intentionally.  If an adjuster denies a claim that should be paid and the company is taken to court and forced to pay they will incur more costs then had they just paid the claim in the first place and can even earn government censure in some cases or further damages for breaching the idea of utmost good faith.  In all such cases their reputation would suffer.  I don&#8217;t work on the claims side but I imagine that denying legitimate claims would be a good way to find yourself out of work.  Insurer&#8217;s don&#8217;t mind paying legitimate claims, that&#8217;s what we do.</p>
<p>Were you in breach of policy conditions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-667051</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-667051</guid>
		<description>@JeremiahOlson

If you had full coverage insurance on the car (which you should since you were not the sole owner) the insurance should pay for the damage.  Your girlfriend had your permission to drive the vehicle and should be covered under the policy.  

Insurance companies are notorious for not wanting to pay out on claims and for giving individuals the run around.  Review your policy (or have a trusted agent/attorney do it for you, they can be hard reading thanks to all the legalese) to see what kinds of losses they cover, and under what circumstances.  I wouldn&#039;t just take &quot;no&quot; for an answer on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JeremiahOlson</p>
<p>If you had full coverage insurance on the car (which you should since you were not the sole owner) the insurance should pay for the damage.  Your girlfriend had your permission to drive the vehicle and should be covered under the policy.  </p>
<p>Insurance companies are notorious for not wanting to pay out on claims and for giving individuals the run around.  Review your policy (or have a trusted agent/attorney do it for you, they can be hard reading thanks to all the legalese) to see what kinds of losses they cover, and under what circumstances.  I wouldn&#8217;t just take &#8220;no&#8221; for an answer on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew @ LifeOfAnInvestor.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-666874</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew @ LifeOfAnInvestor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-666874</guid>
		<description>I just ordered the Ramsey books and expect to get them tomorrow.  I&#039;m excited to see how my daughter takes to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered the Ramsey books and expect to get them tomorrow.  I&#8217;m excited to see how my daughter takes to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mellen</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-666861</link>
		<dc:creator>mellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-666861</guid>
		<description>why do people use the term &quot;self righteous&quot; when they just don&#039;t like what you&#039;re saying? if you don&#039;t like the answer (or can&#039;t handle it), don&#039;t ask the question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do people use the term &#8220;self righteous&#8221; when they just don&#8217;t like what you&#8217;re saying? if you don&#8217;t like the answer (or can&#8217;t handle it), don&#8217;t ask the question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister E</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-666857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-666857</guid>
		<description>@JeremiahOlson

Why won&#039;t the insurance cover the loss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JeremiahOlson</p>
<p>Why won&#8217;t the insurance cover the loss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-666853</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-666853</guid>
		<description>Why do we use the word &quot;theft&quot; for breaking the agreement of a copyright license?  Pirating music is refusing to abide by the terms of a contract - either the contract the owner has with the copyright owner or the contract the copyright has with the government.  There&#039;s a word for that, but I don&#039;t think it should be theft.

I&#039;m not saying piracy shouldn&#039;t be an offense, but is it the &lt;i&gt;crime&lt;/i&gt; of &lt;i&gt;theft&lt;/i&gt; or is it something else?  Defining terms might help here.

We might define digital piracy as &quot;breach of contract.&quot;  Copyright owners could make a civil case for damages/compensation because of the monopoly the government grants the holder to distribute that media.  Stealing a CD, on the other hand, would still be theft since the property was taken from someone and is now in the hands of a wrongful owner &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we use the word &#8220;theft&#8221; for breaking the agreement of a copyright license?  Pirating music is refusing to abide by the terms of a contract &#8211; either the contract the owner has with the copyright owner or the contract the copyright has with the government.  There&#8217;s a word for that, but I don&#8217;t think it should be theft.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying piracy shouldn&#8217;t be an offense, but is it the <i>crime</i> of <i>theft</i> or is it something else?  Defining terms might help here.</p>
<p>We might define digital piracy as &#8220;breach of contract.&#8221;  Copyright owners could make a civil case for damages/compensation because of the monopoly the government grants the holder to distribute that media.  Stealing a CD, on the other hand, would still be theft since the property was taken from someone and is now in the hands of a wrongful owner <i>only</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/05/18/reader-mailbag-63/comment-page-2/#comment-666833</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=3517#comment-666833</guid>
		<description>@Paul, 
You stated that your DW was making payments, but the hospital said they are giving up on asking you for it.  Then you technically still owe the money (and by making payments you were acknowledging that you owed it) and in my opinion y&#039;all should pay the debt.  

I dont work for any collection agency or anything like that.  I just think that people should pay what they incur in debts.  

You got the benefit of the service, and by not paying what you owe (credit card, medical coverage, cars etc) it makes companies have to charge everyone else a little more to cover for those who dont pay.  I dont appreciate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul,<br />
You stated that your DW was making payments, but the hospital said they are giving up on asking you for it.  Then you technically still owe the money (and by making payments you were acknowledging that you owed it) and in my opinion y&#8217;all should pay the debt.  </p>
<p>I dont work for any collection agency or anything like that.  I just think that people should pay what they incur in debts.  </p>
<p>You got the benefit of the service, and by not paying what you owe (credit card, medical coverage, cars etc) it makes companies have to charge everyone else a little more to cover for those who dont pay.  I dont appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.430 seconds -->
