<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay More for These Meaningless Words and Phrases!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/</link>
	<description>Financial talk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Chemist</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927564</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Chemist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By far the most meaningless phrase ever to appear on any product sold in commerce is...&quot;chemical-free&quot;. This inane phrase appears on cosmetics, sunscreens, lip balm and other personal care products as an apparent substitute for &quot;toxicant-free&quot; or &quot;synthetic-chemical-free&quot;. Since every substance on this earth is made of chemicals no product should bear the label chemical free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By far the most meaningless phrase ever to appear on any product sold in commerce is&#8230;&#8221;chemical-free&#8221;. This inane phrase appears on cosmetics, sunscreens, lip balm and other personal care products as an apparent substitute for &#8220;toxicant-free&#8221; or &#8220;synthetic-chemical-free&#8221;. Since every substance on this earth is made of chemicals no product should bear the label chemical free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927482</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My personal favorite is &quot;all natural&quot;. &quot;It&#039;s all natural so it&#039;s good for you.&quot; Then I point out that arsenic, cyanide, and strychnine are also all natural.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal favorite is &#8220;all natural&#8221;. &#8220;It&#8217;s all natural so it&#8217;s good for you.&#8221; Then I point out that arsenic, cyanide, and strychnine are also all natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927395</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organic may not always mean no pesticides.  An organic farmer has the ability to petition to the certification board to use pesticides at the risk of losing crops.  If granted by the board they can still claim the organic label.

Truth is if you want 100% organic foods grow your own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organic may not always mean no pesticides.  An organic farmer has the ability to petition to the certification board to use pesticides at the risk of losing crops.  If granted by the board they can still claim the organic label.</p>
<p>Truth is if you want 100% organic foods grow your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927388</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Local&quot; could also mean anything. :) Or, at least a different radius.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Local&#8221; could also mean anything. :) Or, at least a different radius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suchi</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927372</link>
		<dc:creator>Suchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i completely agree....we do end paying more for terms which dont really matter!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i completely agree&#8230;.we do end paying more for terms which dont really matter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suchi</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927371</link>
		<dc:creator>Suchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree....we do end up paying more for funny names!:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree&#8230;.we do end up paying more for funny names!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLCCOM</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927365</link>
		<dc:creator>SLCCOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asbestos is a mineral. It is  not a chemical, which is why it is not listed under TSCA. Asbestos has saved many, many lives because of the fires that did not happen. Asbestos was mandated for use for over a century, and by far most of the people who get mesothelioma are also tobacco addicts. Tobacco addiction multiplies the risk of mesothelioma ten-fold. Now we are using fiberglass for fire prevention, which has the same physical characteristics as asbestos. 

Given that we are all living longer, as a population, it is fallacious thinking to decide that there are X chemicals and only Y have been tested and only Z have been banned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos is a mineral. It is  not a chemical, which is why it is not listed under TSCA. Asbestos has saved many, many lives because of the fires that did not happen. Asbestos was mandated for use for over a century, and by far most of the people who get mesothelioma are also tobacco addicts. Tobacco addiction multiplies the risk of mesothelioma ten-fold. Now we are using fiberglass for fire prevention, which has the same physical characteristics as asbestos. </p>
<p>Given that we are all living longer, as a population, it is fallacious thinking to decide that there are X chemicals and only Y have been tested and only Z have been banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David/moneycrashers</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927349</link>
		<dc:creator>David/moneycrashers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in complete agreement with including the word &quot;organc&quot; in this list.

It is probably one of the most overused, misused temrs in food today.

If you look closely, you&#039;ll find that a lot of foods marked as organic are really no different at all from their non-organic counterparts--except the price!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in complete agreement with including the word &#8220;organc&#8221; in this list.</p>
<p>It is probably one of the most overused, misused temrs in food today.</p>
<p>If you look closely, you&#8217;ll find that a lot of foods marked as organic are really no different at all from their non-organic counterparts&#8211;except the price!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mol</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a great article. Another great, albeit probably shorter, article would be which Words and Phrases actually have merit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great article. Another great, albeit probably shorter, article would be which Words and Phrases actually have merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927311</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Michelle: I respect what you are saying and I agree with you, but I don&#039;t understand where people are getting the idea that I am &quot;caught up in the idea that there are &#039;kid foods&#039; and &#039;adult foods&#039;&quot;. I disagree with that assertion, as you do - we are not opposed on this matter. But I think you are misunderstanding my original post - as Jackie and others pointed out, I was making a remark about the tendency of little kids to put NON-food items in their mouths - not things that aren&#039;t &quot;real food&quot;, but things like paste and crayons that aren&#039;t food by any definition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michelle: I respect what you are saying and I agree with you, but I don&#8217;t understand where people are getting the idea that I am &#8220;caught up in the idea that there are &#8216;kid foods&#8217; and &#8216;adult foods&#8217;&#8221;. I disagree with that assertion, as you do &#8211; we are not opposed on this matter. But I think you are misunderstanding my original post &#8211; as Jackie and others pointed out, I was making a remark about the tendency of little kids to put NON-food items in their mouths &#8211; not things that aren&#8217;t &#8220;real food&#8221;, but things like paste and crayons that aren&#8217;t food by any definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwingCheese</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927306</link>
		<dc:creator>SwingCheese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Valleycat - I agree! I&#039;ve been buying 100% juice for my toddler, so I&#039;ve been checking out the labels, and, well, it would appear that when he drinks juice, it is almost 100% apple juice, every time. Good thing he loves apples in all forms :)

re: green and organic - I, too, can say that I&#039;ve been to grocery stores where apparently everything is organic, down to the paper towels and paper grocery bags, which always made me snicker. However, only food can be labelled USDA organic (even meat, I think, but the producers still have to meet government standards). &quot;Green&quot;, however, is as meaningless as &quot;natural&quot; - there is no standard that products must meet when claiming this on their labels. And that became VERY apparent to me when Lysol and Clorox all of a sudden became &quot;green&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Valleycat &#8211; I agree! I&#8217;ve been buying 100% juice for my toddler, so I&#8217;ve been checking out the labels, and, well, it would appear that when he drinks juice, it is almost 100% apple juice, every time. Good thing he loves apples in all forms :)</p>
<p>re: green and organic &#8211; I, too, can say that I&#8217;ve been to grocery stores where apparently everything is organic, down to the paper towels and paper grocery bags, which always made me snicker. However, only food can be labelled USDA organic (even meat, I think, but the producers still have to meet government standards). &#8220;Green&#8221;, however, is as meaningless as &#8220;natural&#8221; &#8211; there is no standard that products must meet when claiming this on their labels. And that became VERY apparent to me when Lysol and Clorox all of a sudden became &#8220;green&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WendyH</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927300</link>
		<dc:creator>WendyH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Marie A: that&#039;s what I&#039;ve heard as well, my understanding is also that &quot;no-voc&quot; doesn&#039;t necessarily mean &quot;non-toxic&quot; (in a paint for example), the only way to know for a product like paint is look at the MSDS and see what warnings it has.

from the USDA website on Organic Labeling: &quot;USDA certified organic&quot; label is for 95% - 100% organic ingredients, &quot;made with organic ingredients&quot; marketing term allowed for above 70%, and anything below that can still list individual organic ingredients only on the ingredients label.  There is also a list of synthetic substances allowed in food processing that still qualify for the organic label.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Marie A: that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve heard as well, my understanding is also that &#8220;no-voc&#8221; doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean &#8220;non-toxic&#8221; (in a paint for example), the only way to know for a product like paint is look at the MSDS and see what warnings it has.</p>
<p>from the USDA website on Organic Labeling: &#8220;USDA certified organic&#8221; label is for 95% &#8211; 100% organic ingredients, &#8220;made with organic ingredients&#8221; marketing term allowed for above 70%, and anything below that can still list individual organic ingredients only on the ingredients label.  There is also a list of synthetic substances allowed in food processing that still qualify for the organic label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927297</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just saying that some people get caught up in the idea that there are &quot;kid foods&quot; and &quot;adult foods&quot;. There aren&#039;t. Kids will eat what you give them. I&#039;m not talking about a junk food ban, I&#039;m talking about giving your kids real food. There&#039;s a difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just saying that some people get caught up in the idea that there are &#8220;kid foods&#8221; and &#8220;adult foods&#8221;. There aren&#8217;t. Kids will eat what you give them. I&#8217;m not talking about a junk food ban, I&#8217;m talking about giving your kids real food. There&#8217;s a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie A</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927295</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree to most of your points, but some recent research on my part finds a couple disturbing things that I&#039;m trying to share with many of my friends who generally are just as clueless as I was:

There are over 82,000 chemicals in use in the U.S., with some 700+ new ones added each year.  Of those 82,000, only 650 are monitored through TRI, and only 200 have ever been tested for toxicity, and only FIVE have been banned under the Toxic Substances Control Act (not even asbestos is banned).  You CANNOT assume that the chemicals in the products you use are tested, or that the test results, even if they had a bad outcome, stopped the company from releasing their product to the market.  There are several known toxins in everyday products that cause severe biological issues, but they&#039;re still on the market, and they may not even be listed in your products due to trade laws.  Even if a product says it&#039;s toxin free, that&#039;s just because the chemicals in it haven&#039;t been put on the known toxins list.  The rule is innocent until proven guilty, even in the realm of chemicals put out into the mass market.  And it&#039;s REALLY hard to prove a chemical guilty.

I&#039;m not trying to be an alarmist, I just think more people should know, learn, and pay attention to understand the difference between marketing hype and good wholesome products, even in the &quot;green&quot; marketplace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to most of your points, but some recent research on my part finds a couple disturbing things that I&#8217;m trying to share with many of my friends who generally are just as clueless as I was:</p>
<p>There are over 82,000 chemicals in use in the U.S., with some 700+ new ones added each year.  Of those 82,000, only 650 are monitored through TRI, and only 200 have ever been tested for toxicity, and only FIVE have been banned under the Toxic Substances Control Act (not even asbestos is banned).  You CANNOT assume that the chemicals in the products you use are tested, or that the test results, even if they had a bad outcome, stopped the company from releasing their product to the market.  There are several known toxins in everyday products that cause severe biological issues, but they&#8217;re still on the market, and they may not even be listed in your products due to trade laws.  Even if a product says it&#8217;s toxin free, that&#8217;s just because the chemicals in it haven&#8217;t been put on the known toxins list.  The rule is innocent until proven guilty, even in the realm of chemicals put out into the mass market.  And it&#8217;s REALLY hard to prove a chemical guilty.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to be an alarmist, I just think more people should know, learn, and pay attention to understand the difference between marketing hype and good wholesome products, even in the &#8220;green&#8221; marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gal @ Equally Happy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gal @ Equally Happy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Des and Arti,
My local whole foods has rows and rows of items that are labeled organic despite there being no such standard for items like cosmetics, detergents and clothing.  Organic is regulated only when it comes to food.  Everything else is labeled based on however the manufacturer and vendor want them to be.

Please do some research before rushing to post comments that are so negative.

And I&#039;d like to second Almost There&#039;s comment on reading the Omnivore&#039;s Dilemma.  A great book that will teach you a lot about the meaning of various labels and ingredients.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Des and Arti,<br />
My local whole foods has rows and rows of items that are labeled organic despite there being no such standard for items like cosmetics, detergents and clothing.  Organic is regulated only when it comes to food.  Everything else is labeled based on however the manufacturer and vendor want them to be.</p>
<p>Please do some research before rushing to post comments that are so negative.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d like to second Almost There&#8217;s comment on reading the Omnivore&#8217;s Dilemma.  A great book that will teach you a lot about the meaning of various labels and ingredients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajtacka</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajtacka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds of a webcomic from xkcd: http://xkcd.com/641/.
&quot;Get the one that&#039;s asbestos-free!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds of a webcomic from xkcd: <a href="http://xkcd.com/641/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/641/</a>.<br />
&#8220;Get the one that&#8217;s asbestos-free!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927283</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know whether this makes me part of a trend, but I pay more for locally grown fruits and vegetables because they taste better.  Farmers that sell directly to consumers have an incentive to grow things that taste good.  Farmers that sell through middlemen (who mix up the produce of all different farmers) have an incentive to favor quantity over quality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether this makes me part of a trend, but I pay more for locally grown fruits and vegetables because they taste better.  Farmers that sell directly to consumers have an incentive to grow things that taste good.  Farmers that sell through middlemen (who mix up the produce of all different farmers) have an incentive to favor quantity over quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel Nordvig</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel Nordvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you mention the word &quot;natural&quot;, an interesting conversation I once had with a young girl comes to mind. It evolved around the topic &quot;drugs&quot;. During this conversation, the girl stated, that if she were to try any drug, it would have to be cocaine, because, and I quote: &quot;its a natural product&quot;. The point of this being, that the gruesome chemical that is cocaine, originates from nice, green leaves from plants in the Natural Kingdom of the South American jungle. 
Tobacco, my friends, is &quot;natural&quot;, heroin is natural, dozens of funghi that will kill a grown man in the most painful way, are natural. In fact, EVERYTHING is natural, if you trace it back long enough. You cant synthesize anything without starting with something that ,somewhere back in the proces, started out &quot;natural&quot;. Being eaten by an alligator is a &quot;natural&quot; way to go. You will surely be a part of the circle of life if such a beast sinks its teeth in you - but I still wouldn´t recommend it as a part of a healthy lifestyle! Nature is life, death, sickness and health and everything that surround us - it is not a slogan!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you mention the word &#8220;natural&#8221;, an interesting conversation I once had with a young girl comes to mind. It evolved around the topic &#8220;drugs&#8221;. During this conversation, the girl stated, that if she were to try any drug, it would have to be cocaine, because, and I quote: &#8220;its a natural product&#8221;. The point of this being, that the gruesome chemical that is cocaine, originates from nice, green leaves from plants in the Natural Kingdom of the South American jungle.<br />
Tobacco, my friends, is &#8220;natural&#8221;, heroin is natural, dozens of funghi that will kill a grown man in the most painful way, are natural. In fact, EVERYTHING is natural, if you trace it back long enough. You cant synthesize anything without starting with something that ,somewhere back in the proces, started out &#8220;natural&#8221;. Being eaten by an alligator is a &#8220;natural&#8221; way to go. You will surely be a part of the circle of life if such a beast sinks its teeth in you &#8211; but I still wouldn´t recommend it as a part of a healthy lifestyle! Nature is life, death, sickness and health and everything that surround us &#8211; it is not a slogan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: locally grown

I totally agree that it&#039;s still important to learn about individual conditions.  But the other emphasis on &#039;better for the environment&#039; on locally grown is that if it&#039;s local, it doesn&#039;t need to be transported long distances - which theoretically means less pollution/energy waste from the transport vehicles.

I also some people do it because it&#039;s better for the local economy, keeping your dollars in your area and getting at least some positive impact via taxes if nothing else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: locally grown</p>
<p>I totally agree that it&#8217;s still important to learn about individual conditions.  But the other emphasis on &#8216;better for the environment&#8217; on locally grown is that if it&#8217;s local, it doesn&#8217;t need to be transported long distances &#8211; which theoretically means less pollution/energy waste from the transport vehicles.</p>
<p>I also some people do it because it&#8217;s better for the local economy, keeping your dollars in your area and getting at least some positive impact via taxes if nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister E</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2010/10/12/pay-more-for-these-meaningless-words-and-phrases/#comment-927275</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6092#comment-927275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would also suggest &quot;Green&quot; as a meaningless term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also suggest &#8220;Green&#8221; as a meaningless term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
