<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reader Mailbag: The New Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/</link>
	<description>Financial talk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in W MA</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934419</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in W MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look seriously into stopping payment and  having the car repossessed. Determine how much you will be liable for if you default. 

I doubt your credit history is worth 15K in cash to you, , which is what i&#039;m guessing you owe. Especially when you can build it up again in 4 years and in 7 years the debt will disappear. 

The title company took a gamble on collateralizing a car against a loan of cash so let them take the hit, they are equipped to do that and that&#039;s what business they are in. 

My other suggestions involve dropping 4K off the value and selling it as a private party sale to someone who knows what they are doing with cars, likes Coopers, and who won&#039;t care about the engine and the tranny. These people exist all over the place.

Option C is for the mechanically unafraid and involves buying a $1500 beater for cash and driving that while you do the mechanical work on the Cooper with your won hands. Probably not practical for you but I&#039;m going to list it as an option. For $500 in tools and a few weekends of your time you&#039;ll be done. engine hoists and transmission jacks are available for rent.

None of these last options will help you much though if you don&#039;t have cash to cover the gap in the sale price of the car and your loan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look seriously into stopping payment and  having the car repossessed. Determine how much you will be liable for if you default. </p>
<p>I doubt your credit history is worth 15K in cash to you, , which is what i&#8217;m guessing you owe. Especially when you can build it up again in 4 years and in 7 years the debt will disappear. </p>
<p>The title company took a gamble on collateralizing a car against a loan of cash so let them take the hit, they are equipped to do that and that&#8217;s what business they are in. </p>
<p>My other suggestions involve dropping 4K off the value and selling it as a private party sale to someone who knows what they are doing with cars, likes Coopers, and who won&#8217;t care about the engine and the tranny. These people exist all over the place.</p>
<p>Option C is for the mechanically unafraid and involves buying a $1500 beater for cash and driving that while you do the mechanical work on the Cooper with your won hands. Probably not practical for you but I&#8217;m going to list it as an option. For $500 in tools and a few weekends of your time you&#8217;ll be done. engine hoists and transmission jacks are available for rent.</p>
<p>None of these last options will help you much though if you don&#8217;t have cash to cover the gap in the sale price of the car and your loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in W MA</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934414</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in W MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barbara, the next time you buy a car, used or new, car-- make sure it is one known for reliability. Honda and Toyota for example. 

Also, try to keep your car purchase costs to $5000 and under. You can usually do well with a used Honda or Toyota in the 5-10 year old range. Preferably a standard transmission as they don&#039;t tend to fail like automatics. (My own car&#039;s standard tranny is going on 19 years old now--same tranny, same clutch since the car was new). 

Now, for practical advice about your car--if you have had two failed transmissions, I suspect there is a motor mount issue that is wearing the transmissions. If the motor is not properly mounted then it puts strain on the drivetrain. 

Have you looked into putting the legal heat on the shop that did the work on your car? Transmissions should not be failing left and right. 

Have you been to an online mini cooper forum and gotten experienced enthusiasts&#039; perspectives on it? 

These are all things I would be pursuing. I would start with joining an online mini cooper site and posting about your problem to see what kind of feedback you get and how common this may or may not be for this make of car. 

If your engine fails, as you fear it will, I would start investigating now how to get a used engine into the car. It shouldn&#039;t cost more than about $1500-$2000 total for a good junkyard engine and installation. Aslso price out a new engine from retail sites like Autozone and from the dealer. Ask for the parts price from the parts desk. 

I am a bit baffled by these kinds of problems because i have never spent more than $3200 for a car in my life and I&#039;ve never had these kinds of problems once I learned what cars to get. Honda Accord, Honda Civic, some Toyotas--there are lots of cars out there that will run 26 years without problems. In the future try to stick to them, or at least stick to cars that are no more than 12K new.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara, the next time you buy a car, used or new, car&#8211; make sure it is one known for reliability. Honda and Toyota for example. </p>
<p>Also, try to keep your car purchase costs to $5000 and under. You can usually do well with a used Honda or Toyota in the 5-10 year old range. Preferably a standard transmission as they don&#8217;t tend to fail like automatics. (My own car&#8217;s standard tranny is going on 19 years old now&#8211;same tranny, same clutch since the car was new). </p>
<p>Now, for practical advice about your car&#8211;if you have had two failed transmissions, I suspect there is a motor mount issue that is wearing the transmissions. If the motor is not properly mounted then it puts strain on the drivetrain. </p>
<p>Have you looked into putting the legal heat on the shop that did the work on your car? Transmissions should not be failing left and right. </p>
<p>Have you been to an online mini cooper forum and gotten experienced enthusiasts&#8217; perspectives on it? </p>
<p>These are all things I would be pursuing. I would start with joining an online mini cooper site and posting about your problem to see what kind of feedback you get and how common this may or may not be for this make of car. </p>
<p>If your engine fails, as you fear it will, I would start investigating now how to get a used engine into the car. It shouldn&#8217;t cost more than about $1500-$2000 total for a good junkyard engine and installation. Aslso price out a new engine from retail sites like Autozone and from the dealer. Ask for the parts price from the parts desk. </p>
<p>I am a bit baffled by these kinds of problems because i have never spent more than $3200 for a car in my life and I&#8217;ve never had these kinds of problems once I learned what cars to get. Honda Accord, Honda Civic, some Toyotas&#8211;there are lots of cars out there that will run 26 years without problems. In the future try to stick to them, or at least stick to cars that are no more than 12K new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in W MA</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934411</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in W MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Q5, Roth Woes,

It is not true at all that Roths are &quot;the way to go&quot;.

They are the way to go for people who expect to have large amounts of money available to them in their retiremnent that would put them in a high tax bracket.

Are you likely to have that amount of money?

I think for most people who aren&#039;t going to have more than, say, 1.5 million per person in IRA investments at the time of their retirement, standard IRAS are actually a good deal because their tax bracket will be low anyways when they retire.

You really need to run the numbers of (a) how much you can reasonably expect to invest over the rest of your working life and (b) what is a reasonable expectation of investment gains within your IRA accounts, whether Roth or Traditional,

how much of your money you will be pulling out for each year, combined with how much other income you will have available to you, and what the comparative tax hit will be. 

there are LOTS of factors involved in the Roth vs Traditional decision, including the fact that Roth accounts can be used for some other purposes besides retirement.  You owe it to yourself to sit down and do some of the figuring yourself. 

You can also max out a Traditional IRA in a year and add to a Roth as well because there are combined contribution limits. For most people who are not high income people  that kind of combination will work to their advantage. I would suggest leaving your traditional Roth account as a traditional Roth account, transferring it to a brokerage firm, investing it in equities, and ALSO opening up a Roth account with that brokerage firm and contributing to that. I make this recommendation without knowing your financial status, however. 

Keep in mind that you can convert to a Roth at any time. The best time to do it taxwise (if you want to do it) is in a year when you have low income. Unemployment is a great time to convert a Roth at if you have the cash to cover the tax bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Q5, Roth Woes,</p>
<p>It is not true at all that Roths are &#8220;the way to go&#8221;.</p>
<p>They are the way to go for people who expect to have large amounts of money available to them in their retiremnent that would put them in a high tax bracket.</p>
<p>Are you likely to have that amount of money?</p>
<p>I think for most people who aren&#8217;t going to have more than, say, 1.5 million per person in IRA investments at the time of their retirement, standard IRAS are actually a good deal because their tax bracket will be low anyways when they retire.</p>
<p>You really need to run the numbers of (a) how much you can reasonably expect to invest over the rest of your working life and (b) what is a reasonable expectation of investment gains within your IRA accounts, whether Roth or Traditional,</p>
<p>how much of your money you will be pulling out for each year, combined with how much other income you will have available to you, and what the comparative tax hit will be. </p>
<p>there are LOTS of factors involved in the Roth vs Traditional decision, including the fact that Roth accounts can be used for some other purposes besides retirement.  You owe it to yourself to sit down and do some of the figuring yourself. </p>
<p>You can also max out a Traditional IRA in a year and add to a Roth as well because there are combined contribution limits. For most people who are not high income people  that kind of combination will work to their advantage. I would suggest leaving your traditional Roth account as a traditional Roth account, transferring it to a brokerage firm, investing it in equities, and ALSO opening up a Roth account with that brokerage firm and contributing to that. I make this recommendation without knowing your financial status, however. </p>
<p>Keep in mind that you can convert to a Roth at any time. The best time to do it taxwise (if you want to do it) is in a year when you have low income. Unemployment is a great time to convert a Roth at if you have the cash to cover the tax bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARY</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934378</link>
		<dc:creator>MARY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Mary
I met my husband through a matchmaker (and it was quite a few yrs that I admitted that to anyone-LOL) This was before internet dating. I couldn&#039;t meet anyone through work (worked alone)and didn&#039;t live close to my family (lived in transient area,no close friends nearby). I saw an ad in the newspaper,paid $500( which was not in my nature to do,being very frugal)and after being horribly matched up with 2 idiots, met my husband.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Mary<br />
I met my husband through a matchmaker (and it was quite a few yrs that I admitted that to anyone-LOL) This was before internet dating. I couldn&#8217;t meet anyone through work (worked alone)and didn&#8217;t live close to my family (lived in transient area,no close friends nearby). I saw an ad in the newspaper,paid $500( which was not in my nature to do,being very frugal)and after being horribly matched up with 2 idiots, met my husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934299</link>
		<dc:creator>kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q7 Mary - as someone who is 51, single and childless and who&#039;ve been where you are at one point, I&#039;d imagine what I write would be quite different from the comments above (most of whom I bet are from people who are happily married and with kids). I was slim and quite pretty, and no, it doesn&#039;t help all that much.  

I don&#039;t like Laura&#039;s (#1) advice - this is what I did. No, Mr Right doesn&#039;t just appear. You have to look for him. It may involve being engaged in activities where you could meet the guy, online dating, whatever. Making a list and &quot;dreaming big&quot; is OK, but after you made this list ask yourself - are these things REALLY important? Are they really going to help during family life? Because ultimately, the most important is that he is a good person, honest, someone you can trust, someone who&#039;d be with you when you are sick, someone who cares for you. Yes, you need to have chemistry, but common hobbies and such aren&#039;t that important, neither are looks, they fade anyway (of course there has to be attraction). As you want kids, it&#039;s important that he wants them too. Ask yourself why the online dating didn&#039;t work: could you&#039;ve been too picky? How were you choosing guys? When you were together, how did the conversation go. It didn&#039;t work out for me either by the way, but there were a couple of guys that I thought had potential if I had been a bit less picky.

One interesting thing that I noticed is that my friends who got divorced found the new boyfriend or even husband relatively quickly than those of us who&#039;ve been single for long. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an accident, I think that people who are married are less picky, they know what is important and what is not, and they also really don&#039;t want to be alone. Whereas those of us who&#039;ve been single for a while are pickier, on some level we don&#039;t want to give up our freedom. Think about it, think if you really want to find someone and what you&#039;d be willing to give up for it. Also to expect someone to care for you, you need to be caring person yourself. You need to show to the guy you like that you are interested in what he has to say and that you care for him.

You don&#039;t know how long you&#039;ll be able to have kids. I had premature ovarian failure at 38 (though given the symptoms I&#039;d imagine I actually had the problems starting at 32). Bottom line -you don&#039;t know how much time you have left if any. So if you really want kids - consider having them by yourself. It&#039;ll take the pressure of of having to find the guy soon. In hindsight, I wish I had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q7 Mary &#8211; as someone who is 51, single and childless and who&#8217;ve been where you are at one point, I&#8217;d imagine what I write would be quite different from the comments above (most of whom I bet are from people who are happily married and with kids). I was slim and quite pretty, and no, it doesn&#8217;t help all that much.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like Laura&#8217;s (#1) advice &#8211; this is what I did. No, Mr Right doesn&#8217;t just appear. You have to look for him. It may involve being engaged in activities where you could meet the guy, online dating, whatever. Making a list and &#8220;dreaming big&#8221; is OK, but after you made this list ask yourself &#8211; are these things REALLY important? Are they really going to help during family life? Because ultimately, the most important is that he is a good person, honest, someone you can trust, someone who&#8217;d be with you when you are sick, someone who cares for you. Yes, you need to have chemistry, but common hobbies and such aren&#8217;t that important, neither are looks, they fade anyway (of course there has to be attraction). As you want kids, it&#8217;s important that he wants them too. Ask yourself why the online dating didn&#8217;t work: could you&#8217;ve been too picky? How were you choosing guys? When you were together, how did the conversation go. It didn&#8217;t work out for me either by the way, but there were a couple of guys that I thought had potential if I had been a bit less picky.</p>
<p>One interesting thing that I noticed is that my friends who got divorced found the new boyfriend or even husband relatively quickly than those of us who&#8217;ve been single for long. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an accident, I think that people who are married are less picky, they know what is important and what is not, and they also really don&#8217;t want to be alone. Whereas those of us who&#8217;ve been single for a while are pickier, on some level we don&#8217;t want to give up our freedom. Think about it, think if you really want to find someone and what you&#8217;d be willing to give up for it. Also to expect someone to care for you, you need to be caring person yourself. You need to show to the guy you like that you are interested in what he has to say and that you care for him.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know how long you&#8217;ll be able to have kids. I had premature ovarian failure at 38 (though given the symptoms I&#8217;d imagine I actually had the problems starting at 32). Bottom line -you don&#8217;t know how much time you have left if any. So if you really want kids &#8211; consider having them by yourself. It&#8217;ll take the pressure of of having to find the guy soon. In hindsight, I wish I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary m</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934255</link>
		<dc:creator>mary m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q7 Mary - If you are ready to find love, ask the Universe (aka God) to send your Divine Right Love to you. Sometimes we tend to be very specific in our list of characteristics we want in a partner, and we meet someone who has all of those, but there is no spark, it is not a good match. Trust that God knows your type, leave your request open to a few surprises, and ask for your Divine Right Love. Then continue to do what you do to make yourself the best person you can be. 
This path you are on is a journey, not a sprint. I wish for you love and light.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q7 Mary &#8211; If you are ready to find love, ask the Universe (aka God) to send your Divine Right Love to you. Sometimes we tend to be very specific in our list of characteristics we want in a partner, and we meet someone who has all of those, but there is no spark, it is not a good match. Trust that God knows your type, leave your request open to a few surprises, and ask for your Divine Right Love. Then continue to do what you do to make yourself the best person you can be.<br />
This path you are on is a journey, not a sprint. I wish for you love and light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934250</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ronald - I&#039;m not sure about where you are in life, but it&#039;s always important to mention that divorce rate are over 50% for the population as a whole, for younger demographics, it&#039;s typically higher than that.  Divorces are initiated 70-75% by women as well, and the typical loss of net worth is around 75%.  The average marriage lasts 3-5 years, or, around the time the chemical high from being &quot;in love&quot; is usually over, and reality sets in.  It&#039;s important to protect your financial security, as a divorce can destroy a lifetime of wealth building, and a marriage contract, is the largest contract most people will ever enter into their lives.  While a pre-nup may seem unromantic, a marriage license is a legal contract, not a spiritual one.  You can be spiritually married without the government telling you that you are, but you can lose the farm and quite a bit of future income based on that government contract.  Family and Divorce Courts are usually fairly unkind to men as well - 97% of Alimony goes to women, and 90% of Child Support does, even if the father is a superior parent, there is quite a bit less chance you&#039;ll have custody of your children.  People may not like them, but those are the facts of marriage and divorce in our country.  Tread carefully, it deserves careful consideration not based on a feeling that could be fleeting (although it could last a lifetime).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure about where you are in life, but it&#8217;s always important to mention that divorce rate are over 50% for the population as a whole, for younger demographics, it&#8217;s typically higher than that.  Divorces are initiated 70-75% by women as well, and the typical loss of net worth is around 75%.  The average marriage lasts 3-5 years, or, around the time the chemical high from being &#8220;in love&#8221; is usually over, and reality sets in.  It&#8217;s important to protect your financial security, as a divorce can destroy a lifetime of wealth building, and a marriage contract, is the largest contract most people will ever enter into their lives.  While a pre-nup may seem unromantic, a marriage license is a legal contract, not a spiritual one.  You can be spiritually married without the government telling you that you are, but you can lose the farm and quite a bit of future income based on that government contract.  Family and Divorce Courts are usually fairly unkind to men as well &#8211; 97% of Alimony goes to women, and 90% of Child Support does, even if the father is a superior parent, there is quite a bit less chance you&#8217;ll have custody of your children.  People may not like them, but those are the facts of marriage and divorce in our country.  Tread carefully, it deserves careful consideration not based on a feeling that could be fleeting (although it could last a lifetime).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SP</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934235</link>
		<dc:creator>SP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to recommend a \(non pf) book I recently read:  The immortal life of henrietta lacks.  It is about the HeLa cells, and the woman who &quot;donated&quot; them, and is a nonfiction book that reads like a novel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to recommend a \(non pf) book I recently read:  The immortal life of henrietta lacks.  It is about the HeLa cells, and the woman who &#8220;donated&#8221; them, and is a nonfiction book that reads like a novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934192</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Kevin (#26) - No one said it wouldn&#039;t damage her credit. My only point was that voluntary repossession is a thing, and if her car is going to be repossessed it would be in her best interest to work with the loan company during the process. No one said it was an ideal solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Kevin (#26) &#8211; No one said it wouldn&#8217;t damage her credit. My only point was that voluntary repossession is a thing, and if her car is going to be repossessed it would be in her best interest to work with the loan company during the process. No one said it was an ideal solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934172</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johanna:

You&#039;re right, of course.  There are certain things that can be successfully included in a pre-nup, and other things that cannot be.  Things that are open to negotiation can be included in a pre-nup, and they&#039;ll likely stand up in court.

However, you cannot sign away your right to something guaranteed to you by law.  So if Family Law guarantees you a 50% share of any marital assets, than a pre-nup that sought to alter that formula would be invalid and ignored.

On the other hand, you&#039;re more than welcome to specify who gets your grandmother&#039;s earrings (under the assumption that an asset of equal value would be surrendered to the spouse), as long as the total division of all divided assets remains 50/50.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johanna:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, of course.  There are certain things that can be successfully included in a pre-nup, and other things that cannot be.  Things that are open to negotiation can be included in a pre-nup, and they&#8217;ll likely stand up in court.</p>
<p>However, you cannot sign away your right to something guaranteed to you by law.  So if Family Law guarantees you a 50% share of any marital assets, than a pre-nup that sought to alter that formula would be invalid and ignored.</p>
<p>On the other hand, you&#8217;re more than welcome to specify who gets your grandmother&#8217;s earrings (under the assumption that an asset of equal value would be surrendered to the spouse), as long as the total division of all divided assets remains 50/50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934149</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kevin: The example you give just speaks to the importance of doing a prenup right, if you&#039;re going to do one at all.  You make it sound like judges are just disregarding people&#039;s wishes willy-nilly.  But presumably, the areas in which Ontario law takes precedence over any prenup are no secret - or should be no secret to any competent lawyer.  So you need to make sure that when you draw up your prenup, it doesn&#039;t say anything that would render it invalid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin: The example you give just speaks to the importance of doing a prenup right, if you&#8217;re going to do one at all.  You make it sound like judges are just disregarding people&#8217;s wishes willy-nilly.  But presumably, the areas in which Ontario law takes precedence over any prenup are no secret &#8211; or should be no secret to any competent lawyer.  So you need to make sure that when you draw up your prenup, it doesn&#8217;t say anything that would render it invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934142</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note that in some jurisdictions (like Ontario, Canada, for example), Family Law supercedes pre-nuptual agreements.

So say a couple gets married, and they both sign a pre-nup that says in the event of a divorce, the husband will keep any assets he inherits during the marriage.

While they&#039;re married, the husband&#039;s parents die, and he inherits $4 million.

Then the marriage breaks down and they divorce.  The wife takes him to court requesting half of the husband&#039;s $4 million inheritance.  The husband holds up the pre-nup and says, &quot;we agreed that I&#039;d keep this money.&quot;

Since Family Law in Ontario says that spouses are entitled to 50% of any assets acquired DURING the marriage, the judge will side with the wife.  He will disregard the pre-nuptual agreement and award the wife $2 million (in addition to half of whatever other marital assets are part of the dispersement).

Heck, in BC a judge has already ignored a man&#039;s last will and testament, and divided things up how HE felt was fair.  Aren&#039;t wills just as sacred as pre-nups?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that in some jurisdictions (like Ontario, Canada, for example), Family Law supercedes pre-nuptual agreements.</p>
<p>So say a couple gets married, and they both sign a pre-nup that says in the event of a divorce, the husband will keep any assets he inherits during the marriage.</p>
<p>While they&#8217;re married, the husband&#8217;s parents die, and he inherits $4 million.</p>
<p>Then the marriage breaks down and they divorce.  The wife takes him to court requesting half of the husband&#8217;s $4 million inheritance.  The husband holds up the pre-nup and says, &#8220;we agreed that I&#8217;d keep this money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since Family Law in Ontario says that spouses are entitled to 50% of any assets acquired DURING the marriage, the judge will side with the wife.  He will disregard the pre-nuptual agreement and award the wife $2 million (in addition to half of whatever other marital assets are part of the dispersement).</p>
<p>Heck, in BC a judge has already ignored a man&#8217;s last will and testament, and divided things up how HE felt was fair.  Aren&#8217;t wills just as sacred as pre-nups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam P</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934141</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great analogy JJ. I like that a lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analogy JJ. I like that a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934134</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the thing about prenups. Yes, they are, as Trent put is, a &quot;a legally binding plan for separating [a couple&#039;s] assets&quot; in the case of a divorce.

But guess what? You already *are* operating under a legally binding plan for separating your assets in the case of divorce.

It&#039;s the one that your state has put into place. Think of that as the &quot;default&quot; plan that you get if you both decide not to do a prenup.

So a prenup is only basically saying &quot;we don&#039;t think the default plan suits us, so we&#039;re specifying another one.&quot; It doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re planning for a divorce or that one of you doesn&#039;t trust the other one. It just means that you want to customize the default plan.

JJ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing about prenups. Yes, they are, as Trent put is, a &#8220;a legally binding plan for separating [a couple's] assets&#8221; in the case of a divorce.</p>
<p>But guess what? You already *are* operating under a legally binding plan for separating your assets in the case of divorce.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the one that your state has put into place. Think of that as the &#8220;default&#8221; plan that you get if you both decide not to do a prenup.</p>
<p>So a prenup is only basically saying &#8220;we don&#8217;t think the default plan suits us, so we&#8217;re specifying another one.&#8221; It doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re planning for a divorce or that one of you doesn&#8217;t trust the other one. It just means that you want to customize the default plan.</p>
<p>JJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934107</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ronald wondered: &quot;I want my bride-to-be to sign a prenupital agreement. She tells me it’s not necessary. What do you think?&quot;

Many people seem to think that a prenup is a cold and heartless intrusion into something (marriage planning) that should be joyous and emotional. If handled wrong, it certainly can be, but given that the divorce rate is pushing 50% in many parts of North America, it&#039;s not an unreasonable precaution. Not to mention that sometimes a partner dies unexpectedly, and then a prenup must integrate with whatever will you&#039;ve created.

In addition, something resembling a prenup may actually be a legal requirement in some jurisdictions (i.e., full disclosure of your assets and liabilities). In other jurisdictions (including Quebec, where I live), a prenup is necessary because if you don&#039;t have one, the government will decide how your assets should be divided. Prenups can also be an important way to protect the children of one partner from a previous marriage after the death of that parent.

All that being said, a prenup should be created the same way you create your wedding ceremony and marriage vows: with love, respect, and a concern for the other person&#039;s needs. That attitude is a great way to start a marriage and a good precedent for how to be good to each other in the future. Should the marriage eventually fail, that same attitude can help you end it gracefully and without the kind of festering pettiness that dogs so many divorces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald wondered: &#8220;I want my bride-to-be to sign a prenupital agreement. She tells me it’s not necessary. What do you think?&#8221;</p>
<p>Many people seem to think that a prenup is a cold and heartless intrusion into something (marriage planning) that should be joyous and emotional. If handled wrong, it certainly can be, but given that the divorce rate is pushing 50% in many parts of North America, it&#8217;s not an unreasonable precaution. Not to mention that sometimes a partner dies unexpectedly, and then a prenup must integrate with whatever will you&#8217;ve created.</p>
<p>In addition, something resembling a prenup may actually be a legal requirement in some jurisdictions (i.e., full disclosure of your assets and liabilities). In other jurisdictions (including Quebec, where I live), a prenup is necessary because if you don&#8217;t have one, the government will decide how your assets should be divided. Prenups can also be an important way to protect the children of one partner from a previous marriage after the death of that parent.</p>
<p>All that being said, a prenup should be created the same way you create your wedding ceremony and marriage vows: with love, respect, and a concern for the other person&#8217;s needs. That attitude is a great way to start a marriage and a good precedent for how to be good to each other in the future. Should the marriage eventually fail, that same attitude can help you end it gracefully and without the kind of festering pettiness that dogs so many divorces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934102</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Des

Giving up your car &quot;voluntarily&quot; may indeed result in lower costs for the borrower (because the lender tacks on any extra charges, like towing and storage fees, onto the outstanding balance owing), but I still disagree that it does any less damage to your credit report.

In your credit report, they&#039;ll look exactly the same.  It will show up as a repossession.  A breach of a loan agreement.  It will make future borrowing, insurance, and even job and apartment hunting, more difficult and costly for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Des</p>
<p>Giving up your car &#8220;voluntarily&#8221; may indeed result in lower costs for the borrower (because the lender tacks on any extra charges, like towing and storage fees, onto the outstanding balance owing), but I still disagree that it does any less damage to your credit report.</p>
<p>In your credit report, they&#8217;ll look exactly the same.  It will show up as a repossession.  A breach of a loan agreement.  It will make future borrowing, insurance, and even job and apartment hunting, more difficult and costly for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also disagree with the classification of irregular expenses as savings. I&#039;m actually in the process of setting up a separate account that I&#039;ll pay into monthly to cover such irregular expenses. This will include gifts (Christmas, birthdays, etc), car/house insurance and propane (which we buy twice a year). I may very well put the money into a Savings Account, so I get a small return on it, but I do not consider this money savings. Its more like pre-paying for a service that you know you&#039;ll use. In this case, I know I&#039;ll be spending the money within 12 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also disagree with the classification of irregular expenses as savings. I&#8217;m actually in the process of setting up a separate account that I&#8217;ll pay into monthly to cover such irregular expenses. This will include gifts (Christmas, birthdays, etc), car/house insurance and propane (which we buy twice a year). I may very well put the money into a Savings Account, so I get a small return on it, but I do not consider this money savings. Its more like pre-paying for a service that you know you&#8217;ll use. In this case, I know I&#8217;ll be spending the money within 12 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherie</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934094</link>
		<dc:creator>cherie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s so rare I disagree with you that I had to write LOL - I see I&#039;m not alone
Saving for irregular but KNOWN expenses is not saving, in my book . . . it&#039;s just paying an expense.  The fact that I pay my car insurance annually and save for it all during the year ahead so that I can is not so different than someone who pays it monthly.  Just ahead in time. 
However I wouldn&#039;t count that towards a savings goal percentage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so rare I disagree with you that I had to write LOL &#8211; I see I&#8217;m not alone<br />
Saving for irregular but KNOWN expenses is not saving, in my book . . . it&#8217;s just paying an expense.  The fact that I pay my car insurance annually and save for it all during the year ahead so that I can is not so different than someone who pays it monthly.  Just ahead in time.<br />
However I wouldn&#8217;t count that towards a savings goal percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Systemizer</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934068</link>
		<dc:creator>Systemizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Q7: Working on a goal&quot;

I smell a business opportunity: Trent as matchmaker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Q7: Working on a goal&#8221;</p>
<p>I smell a business opportunity: Trent as matchmaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/03/reader-mailbag-the-new-year/#comment-934054</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6451#comment-934054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q7 Mary
I don&#039;t know if it is any help at all, but your situation could have been me three years ago, except I was one year younger and had just broken off an engagement.  I knew I wanted a family, and started the process to adopt a little boy.  About one year into a two year long adoption process, I met the man of my dreams.  I really wasn&#039;t looking for a relationship at all at that point, just a friend to go out with from time to time so I wouldn&#039;t be a complete hermit.  Long story short, I am now married with a darling six year old son and a precious 4 month old daughter.  I had truly given up on finding my soul mate, and I was completely at peace with that, but then suddenly - there he was!  

Just as an aside, we met via Internet, but the site never matched us.  My husband just got tired of the people that were showing up as his matches and searched through the site by hand.  I showed up, we e-mailed and then met in person, and we were together every weekend until I left to complete the adoption.  

I guess what I&#039;m trying to get at is to be open to many ways to create a family and don&#039;t ever give up on the universe surpassing even your greatest expectations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q7 Mary<br />
I don&#8217;t know if it is any help at all, but your situation could have been me three years ago, except I was one year younger and had just broken off an engagement.  I knew I wanted a family, and started the process to adopt a little boy.  About one year into a two year long adoption process, I met the man of my dreams.  I really wasn&#8217;t looking for a relationship at all at that point, just a friend to go out with from time to time so I wouldn&#8217;t be a complete hermit.  Long story short, I am now married with a darling six year old son and a precious 4 month old daughter.  I had truly given up on finding my soul mate, and I was completely at peace with that, but then suddenly &#8211; there he was!  </p>
<p>Just as an aside, we met via Internet, but the site never matched us.  My husband just got tired of the people that were showing up as his matches and searched through the site by hand.  I showed up, we e-mailed and then met in person, and we were together every weekend until I left to complete the adoption.  </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m trying to get at is to be open to many ways to create a family and don&#8217;t ever give up on the universe surpassing even your greatest expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
