<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost and Quality: Best and Worst Case Scenarios</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/</link>
	<description>Financial talk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deRuiter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-937006</link>
		<dc:creator>deRuiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-937006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Estate sales and house sales are good sources for real good quality knives.  You have to know what makes a good knife, and then take the time to hunt for them.  I have half a dozen really good, well made knives which hold an edge a long time, and there isn&#039;t $10. invested in the lot of them.  They were made long ago, and all we did was sharpen them and wash them, and they are great. This conserves natural resuources by using existing ittems, saves us a lot of money, and gives the satisfaction of using fine quality items.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estate sales and house sales are good sources for real good quality knives.  You have to know what makes a good knife, and then take the time to hunt for them.  I have half a dozen really good, well made knives which hold an edge a long time, and there isn&#8217;t $10. invested in the lot of them.  They were made long ago, and all we did was sharpen them and wash them, and they are great. This conserves natural resuources by using existing ittems, saves us a lot of money, and gives the satisfaction of using fine quality items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935679</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this the other week, and there was something that gnawed at me, and it comes to this: you are comparing used cheap, to new good.  To make this an apples to apples comparison cheap would have to be new as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this the other week, and there was something that gnawed at me, and it comes to this: you are comparing used cheap, to new good.  To make this an apples to apples comparison cheap would have to be new as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935311</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes buying the cheaper product results in having to buy a second one when the first one breaks.  My case in point are some garden hose sprayers we bought for $10 per set where the handles broke pretty quickly.  They seemed good enough before they broke, but it would have been less time and energy to buy the more expensive, sturdier ones than having to trek back to Lowe&#039;s.

Free should only trump everything if the item is close to perfect or gently used.  (perhaps that was not mentioned because it&#039;s an understood fact?)

Getting a free, used keyboard is a great idea.  The keys on a keyboard are fairly standard (action not withstanding), so if you find you lose interest in the hobby, nothing lost!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes buying the cheaper product results in having to buy a second one when the first one breaks.  My case in point are some garden hose sprayers we bought for $10 per set where the handles broke pretty quickly.  They seemed good enough before they broke, but it would have been less time and energy to buy the more expensive, sturdier ones than having to trek back to Lowe&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Free should only trump everything if the item is close to perfect or gently used.  (perhaps that was not mentioned because it&#8217;s an understood fact?)</p>
<p>Getting a free, used keyboard is a great idea.  The keys on a keyboard are fairly standard (action not withstanding), so if you find you lose interest in the hobby, nothing lost!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in W MA</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935296</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in W MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will give one piece of easy advice about knives (even though the article wasn&#039;t really about knives!)  which is: don&#039;t ever buy the cheap serrated ones. They are usually made of inferior metal, with the serrations added to help them to cut aggressively.

Get knives that are non-serrated (for general purposes, unless you are talking about a bread knife) and the metal on them should not generally and you will likely be headed in the right direction and you will in most cases get a knife that is decently serviceable if you also have a means of touching up the edge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give one piece of easy advice about knives (even though the article wasn&#8217;t really about knives!)  which is: don&#8217;t ever buy the cheap serrated ones. They are usually made of inferior metal, with the serrations added to help them to cut aggressively.</p>
<p>Get knives that are non-serrated (for general purposes, unless you are talking about a bread knife) and the metal on them should not generally and you will likely be headed in the right direction and you will in most cases get a knife that is decently serviceable if you also have a means of touching up the edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in W MA</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in W MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those dull bladles that a few people threw out were probably savable (as long as the metal was good enough on the blade) A seriously dull blade needs to be sharpened using something that is capable of removing enough metal to restore the geometry of the edge. Most &quot;knife sharpener&quot; kits don&#039;t allow that and are more for retouching a slightly dulled or dinged blade.

a $50 combination Shun japanese waterston, 300/1000 grit is what I use for most sharpening. I use the 300 grit (there are actually coarser grits available but I don&#039;t see the need for one in my own life)  on heavily abused blades in order to restore the geometry, followed by the 1000 grit to bring it to near razor sharpness, followed by stropping on a piece of newsprint laid across the stone for full raxor sharpness (cardboard words too.)

There&#039;s no doubt that there is both an art and science to sharpening, and that it does take some investment of time and effort and study. 

For most people, a Cutco pull-through sharpener works fine. It won&#039;t restore a truly neglected blade but it does a good job on most blades without the user needing to totally understand what he/she is trying to accomplish.

If you really want to learn to sharpen, I recommend Murray Carter&#039;s DVD about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those dull bladles that a few people threw out were probably savable (as long as the metal was good enough on the blade) A seriously dull blade needs to be sharpened using something that is capable of removing enough metal to restore the geometry of the edge. Most &#8220;knife sharpener&#8221; kits don&#8217;t allow that and are more for retouching a slightly dulled or dinged blade.</p>
<p>a $50 combination Shun japanese waterston, 300/1000 grit is what I use for most sharpening. I use the 300 grit (there are actually coarser grits available but I don&#8217;t see the need for one in my own life)  on heavily abused blades in order to restore the geometry, followed by the 1000 grit to bring it to near razor sharpness, followed by stropping on a piece of newsprint laid across the stone for full raxor sharpness (cardboard words too.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that there is both an art and science to sharpening, and that it does take some investment of time and effort and study. </p>
<p>For most people, a Cutco pull-through sharpener works fine. It won&#8217;t restore a truly neglected blade but it does a good job on most blades without the user needing to totally understand what he/she is trying to accomplish.</p>
<p>If you really want to learn to sharpen, I recommend Murray Carter&#8217;s DVD about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tall Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935105</link>
		<dc:creator>Tall Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The top knife was made by Chicago Cutlery in the 1970&#039;s &amp; I just cleaned mine up &amp; placed it in the block with 7 others of the same make. Take care of things &amp; they&#039;ll take care of you. Used daily for 30+ years &amp; straightened with the steel at each use, hollow ground sharpened about once a month. Looking at the new ones, but these keep delivering daily. Have a Great 2011 all! ! !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top knife was made by Chicago Cutlery in the 1970&#8242;s &amp; I just cleaned mine up &amp; placed it in the block with 7 others of the same make. Take care of things &amp; they&#8217;ll take care of you. Used daily for 30+ years &amp; straightened with the steel at each use, hollow ground sharpened about once a month. Looking at the new ones, but these keep delivering daily. Have a Great 2011 all! ! !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935081</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really love your idea in theory (and usually in practice), but I&#039;d disagree with applying it to knives.  I would rather look at the different between a $50 knife and a $115 knife.  The main key is to make sure you have a knife that stays sharp, and you should be able to keep it that way.  I agree with so many here that there are real dangers to using poor knives.

With knives, I&#039;ve gotten several for free.  All I ever do is end up giving them away (or trashing them).  I don&#039;t buy super pricey knives, but I do buy decent, solid knives that hold an edge.  To me, it&#039;s worth it to spend $30-50 on a knife rather than constantly curse a dull one and worry about cutting myself.

A better place to make this argument, it would seem, are in things where a little quality might not make a difference.  For example, with textbooks, I frequently buy used because it really doesn&#039;t matter if there are a few notes or highlights in the book; it won&#039;t affect my experience.  Or with my new cross-country skiis.  I did buy new skiis, but I bought low-end, recreational ones.  I could have spent more to get really nice, fancy skiis.  But even though I ski about once a week in the winter, I never ski for speed or performance.  I just like getting out, enjoy the woods, and having some exercise.  For me, the $250 pair I bought are good enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love your idea in theory (and usually in practice), but I&#8217;d disagree with applying it to knives.  I would rather look at the different between a $50 knife and a $115 knife.  The main key is to make sure you have a knife that stays sharp, and you should be able to keep it that way.  I agree with so many here that there are real dangers to using poor knives.</p>
<p>With knives, I&#8217;ve gotten several for free.  All I ever do is end up giving them away (or trashing them).  I don&#8217;t buy super pricey knives, but I do buy decent, solid knives that hold an edge.  To me, it&#8217;s worth it to spend $30-50 on a knife rather than constantly curse a dull one and worry about cutting myself.</p>
<p>A better place to make this argument, it would seem, are in things where a little quality might not make a difference.  For example, with textbooks, I frequently buy used because it really doesn&#8217;t matter if there are a few notes or highlights in the book; it won&#8217;t affect my experience.  Or with my new cross-country skiis.  I did buy new skiis, but I bought low-end, recreational ones.  I could have spent more to get really nice, fancy skiis.  But even though I ski about once a week in the winter, I never ski for speed or performance.  I just like getting out, enjoy the woods, and having some exercise.  For me, the $250 pair I bought are good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almost there</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935075</link>
		<dc:creator>almost there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[correction to #36 comment: &quot;hone&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction to #36 comment: &#8220;hone&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almost there</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935074</link>
		<dc:creator>almost there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tyler, I don&#039;t know about the time and cost to find a fifty cent knife. But my dollar stores in town have plenty of knives for twice that and sometimes include multiple knives for that much. And what of the &quot;free&quot; knife sets with cutting board included with an order of Omaha Steaks? Just sayin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler, I don&#8217;t know about the time and cost to find a fifty cent knife. But my dollar stores in town have plenty of knives for twice that and sometimes include multiple knives for that much. And what of the &#8220;free&#8221; knife sets with cutting board included with an order of Omaha Steaks? Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael bash</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935070</link>
		<dc:creator>michael bash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Henckel guy for nearly 40 years and want to repeat their slogan which is both true and clever. &quot;The only knife your grandkids will ever need.&quot;  Well said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Henckel guy for nearly 40 years and want to repeat their slogan which is both true and clever. &#8220;The only knife your grandkids will ever need.&#8221;  Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935031</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Luke

I think part of it is that just reading through, Trent&#039;s conclusions don&#039;t really seem to fit his experience.  He gives examples of three types of knives:  almost-free/middle/pricey and then even though in his own analysis the middle one is clearly the best value, he dismisses it from his conclusion  and even ignores it in the question itself and just says &#039;free is better than expensive&#039;.

It&#039;s just weird.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luke</p>
<p>I think part of it is that just reading through, Trent&#8217;s conclusions don&#8217;t really seem to fit his experience.  He gives examples of three types of knives:  almost-free/middle/pricey and then even though in his own analysis the middle one is clearly the best value, he dismisses it from his conclusion  and even ignores it in the question itself and just says &#8216;free is better than expensive&#8217;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935010</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A factor not included in the analysis is time. What is the time needed to hunt down a $0.50 knife? The time required to sharpen or hone before every use? The time needed to research the products? What you save in monetary cost, you have used in time cost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A factor not included in the analysis is time. What is the time needed to hunt down a $0.50 knife? The time required to sharpen or hone before every use? The time needed to research the products? What you save in monetary cost, you have used in time cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathie</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935006</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[possibly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>possibly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathie</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935005</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  I believe that Trent was using his knives as an example.  Obviously if your $.50 is so dangerous that you could easily cut your finger off that would be the worst case scenario.  And you could also cut your finger off with a highly sharpened expensive knife-an accident that could possible occur in any case is not part of his example, nor should it have been.  Is there some sort of &quot;prove Trent wrong&quot; group that I&#039;m not aware of?  Or rather, &quot;of which I&#039;m unaware,&quot; for the grammar-correctors.  Jeez.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I believe that Trent was using his knives as an example.  Obviously if your $.50 is so dangerous that you could easily cut your finger off that would be the worst case scenario.  And you could also cut your finger off with a highly sharpened expensive knife-an accident that could possible occur in any case is not part of his example, nor should it have been.  Is there some sort of &#8220;prove Trent wrong&#8221; group that I&#8217;m not aware of?  Or rather, &#8220;of which I&#8217;m unaware,&#8221; for the grammar-correctors.  Jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-935001</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-935001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Luke: You seem to be taking this awfully personally.  Do you have money invested in cheap-knife stocks, perchance? :)

Anyway, first of all, I&#039;m not even sure what &quot;argument&quot; you&#039;re talking about.  All people are doing is pointing out that Trent&#039;s statement that &quot;the worst thing that can possibly happen is you lose 50 cents&quot; is not true.
Second, knife sharpeners are not free.  There are cheap ones that you can get for a few bucks, but there are also ones that run into the $100+ range.  So the total cost of a 50-cent knife plus a knife sharpener is more than 50 cents.  And if you&#039;re buying a knife plus a knife sharpener, then you have two items for which you have to figure out the relationship between cost and quality, not just one.
Third, as Steve in W MA notes, &quot;just sharpen the knife when it needs sharpening&quot; requires that you know how to tell when the knife needs sharpening, which not everybody does.

Again, I&#039;m not saying that everybody needs to be buying $100 knives - just that the tradeoff between low-end and high-end items is not nearly as clear cut (pun intended) as Trent&#039;s making it out to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luke: You seem to be taking this awfully personally.  Do you have money invested in cheap-knife stocks, perchance? :)</p>
<p>Anyway, first of all, I&#8217;m not even sure what &#8220;argument&#8221; you&#8217;re talking about.  All people are doing is pointing out that Trent&#8217;s statement that &#8220;the worst thing that can possibly happen is you lose 50 cents&#8221; is not true.<br />
Second, knife sharpeners are not free.  There are cheap ones that you can get for a few bucks, but there are also ones that run into the $100+ range.  So the total cost of a 50-cent knife plus a knife sharpener is more than 50 cents.  And if you&#8217;re buying a knife plus a knife sharpener, then you have two items for which you have to figure out the relationship between cost and quality, not just one.<br />
Third, as Steve in W MA notes, &#8220;just sharpen the knife when it needs sharpening&#8221; requires that you know how to tell when the knife needs sharpening, which not everybody does.</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m not saying that everybody needs to be buying $100 knives &#8211; just that the tradeoff between low-end and high-end items is not nearly as clear cut (pun intended) as Trent&#8217;s making it out to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-934993</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-934993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&quot;Dull&quot;

I really don&#039;t get all of the hubbub over the $0.50 knife being dull?  Trent never advocated buying the knife *and never sharpening it*!  Seriously, folks!  A knife sharpener is not a big-ticket item!  A $0.50 knife can--and should--be sharpened!  

Then...once it&#039;s been sharpened...what exactly is wrong with it?  (Other than the fact that your argument disappears.)  If it needs sharpening every two months because it is a weaker metal...well, then sharpen it again!  :)  Not rocket science!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@&#8221;Dull&#8221;</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t get all of the hubbub over the $0.50 knife being dull?  Trent never advocated buying the knife *and never sharpening it*!  Seriously, folks!  A knife sharpener is not a big-ticket item!  A $0.50 knife can&#8211;and should&#8211;be sharpened!  </p>
<p>Then&#8230;once it&#8217;s been sharpened&#8230;what exactly is wrong with it?  (Other than the fact that your argument disappears.)  If it needs sharpening every two months because it is a weaker metal&#8230;well, then sharpen it again!  :)  Not rocket science!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabrizio</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-934991</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-934991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
I think your reasoning should include external costs, like production and dismissal costs.
I mean, very cheap stuff are producted without paying much attention about environmental implication (in the whole supply chain).
Although your worse scenario/zero costs is still valuable, I think it should be extended including process costs.
In your reasoning you focused only on product quality and this means allocate process (hidden) costs to external entities.
I think the best choice would be the Henckel knife. You get, with it, a good knife and one item for a long, minimizing as much as possible production and environmental costs.
Fabrizio]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I think your reasoning should include external costs, like production and dismissal costs.<br />
I mean, very cheap stuff are producted without paying much attention about environmental implication (in the whole supply chain).<br />
Although your worse scenario/zero costs is still valuable, I think it should be extended including process costs.<br />
In your reasoning you focused only on product quality and this means allocate process (hidden) costs to external entities.<br />
I think the best choice would be the Henckel knife. You get, with it, a good knife and one item for a long, minimizing as much as possible production and environmental costs.<br />
Fabrizio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougR</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-934988</link>
		<dc:creator>DougR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-934988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love this post and the responses! Clearly you can obviate some of the &quot;worst case&quot; scenarios for the 50-cent knife by keeping it good and sharp--a little extra work maybe, but if it CAN be kept as sharp as the Global with a little extra work (and a handy ceramic sharpener), you&#039;ve got a classic knife that does the job. 

Here&#039;s another example: wiring your speakers on your hi-fi setup with ordinary lamp cord versus fancy-schmancy Monster (or similar) premium cables. You can pay a buck or two, or ... well, it&#039;s possible to pay thousands of dollars for several feet of speaker wire. (Really!) I&#039;d be surprised if one person in 10,000 could actually tell the difference, if the test was set up correctly.

With musical instruments, it&#039;s a little different: I rented a saxophone once, a cheapie, and it was badly designed and physically hard to play (key leverage design and spring tension were awful). The physical uncomfortableness of bad design would have been enough to drive many potential musicians away. That&#039;s a situation where you need to either know the universe you&#039;re buying into, or know someone (e.g. a professional musician) who does. The horn I&#039;m playing now is a classic that cost me a little over a thousand bucks (a hefty taste, a while back) but it was such an ergonomic joy to play that it made practicing something to look forward to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this post and the responses! Clearly you can obviate some of the &#8220;worst case&#8221; scenarios for the 50-cent knife by keeping it good and sharp&#8211;a little extra work maybe, but if it CAN be kept as sharp as the Global with a little extra work (and a handy ceramic sharpener), you&#8217;ve got a classic knife that does the job. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another example: wiring your speakers on your hi-fi setup with ordinary lamp cord versus fancy-schmancy Monster (or similar) premium cables. You can pay a buck or two, or &#8230; well, it&#8217;s possible to pay thousands of dollars for several feet of speaker wire. (Really!) I&#8217;d be surprised if one person in 10,000 could actually tell the difference, if the test was set up correctly.</p>
<p>With musical instruments, it&#8217;s a little different: I rented a saxophone once, a cheapie, and it was badly designed and physically hard to play (key leverage design and spring tension were awful). The physical uncomfortableness of bad design would have been enough to drive many potential musicians away. That&#8217;s a situation where you need to either know the universe you&#8217;re buying into, or know someone (e.g. a professional musician) who does. The horn I&#8217;m playing now is a classic that cost me a little over a thousand bucks (a hefty taste, a while back) but it was such an ergonomic joy to play that it made practicing something to look forward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deRuiter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-934987</link>
		<dc:creator>deRuiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-934987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;knife set given to my wife and I as a wedding gift.&quot;   Incorrect, it&#039;s &quot;to my wife and me...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;knife set given to my wife and I as a wedding gift.&#8221;   Incorrect, it&#8217;s &#8220;to my wife and me&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen@TheFrugalGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/01/11/cost-and-quality-best-and-worst-case-scenarios/#comment-934983</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen@TheFrugalGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6489#comment-934983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a pianist and piano teacher, I have to say that if you want to drop a couple thousand on a piano, I heartily recommend going with a real piano.  Electric &quot;pianos&quot; just are NOT the same.

I bought my very nice upright piano for $5500, and I am pleased as punch with it.  I have never, ever played an electric piano that comes even faintly close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a pianist and piano teacher, I have to say that if you want to drop a couple thousand on a piano, I heartily recommend going with a real piano.  Electric &#8220;pianos&#8221; just are NOT the same.</p>
<p>I bought my very nice upright piano for $5500, and I am pleased as punch with it.  I have never, ever played an electric piano that comes even faintly close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
