<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Simple Dollar Weekly Roundup: Volunteer Readers Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/</link>
	<description>Financial talk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can understand why you&#039;d want to keep TSD a single-author blog, but I think for the gaming page it&#039;d be wise to take contributions from others, if only because the gaming experience is so much more interactive.  It&#039;d be smarter to take contributions from elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why you&#8217;d want to keep TSD a single-author blog, but I think for the gaming page it&#8217;d be wise to take contributions from others, if only because the gaming experience is so much more interactive.  It&#8217;d be smarter to take contributions from elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939747</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always thought of &quot;personal style&quot; as knowing the type/fit/color of clothes that fit and make you look your best or, just as importantly, that you will wear.

Doesn&#039;t need to be expensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought of &#8220;personal style&#8221; as knowing the type/fit/color of clothes that fit and make you look your best or, just as importantly, that you will wear.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t need to be expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: partgypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939740</link>
		<dc:creator>partgypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think people misunderstand what a &quot;personal style&quot; is. If your personal style is lazyboy loungers, baseball caps and tshirts with sayings on them, then that is your personal style. I guess the point is, is not that some people don&#039;t have a personal style, but to not feel bad if you are one of those people who are not particularly interested in expressing yourself via clothes and furnishings.  I am by no means a fashion-oriented person but I think people should have some self-respect. I choose not to wear grossly nonfitting clothing (in either direction), sweatpants/athletic wear (when not doing athletics) or plastic shoes in public.  If that makes me a snob so be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people misunderstand what a &#8220;personal style&#8221; is. If your personal style is lazyboy loungers, baseball caps and tshirts with sayings on them, then that is your personal style. I guess the point is, is not that some people don&#8217;t have a personal style, but to not feel bad if you are one of those people who are not particularly interested in expressing yourself via clothes and furnishings.  I am by no means a fashion-oriented person but I think people should have some self-respect. I choose not to wear grossly nonfitting clothing (in either direction), sweatpants/athletic wear (when not doing athletics) or plastic shoes in public.  If that makes me a snob so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939733</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the idea of not needing a personal style to be noticed is very similar to the idea of not needing a college degree to be noticed.  People make assessments and assumptions quickly - in this world, we have to.  Having a college degree sends a message about you.  Having a personal style sends a message about you.  It&#039;s one way of branding yourself.  You don&#039;t need to spend a lot of money, but I believe there is indeed value to thinking about what message your appearance sends to the world and making sure that aligns with what conclusions you hope they draw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea of not needing a personal style to be noticed is very similar to the idea of not needing a college degree to be noticed.  People make assessments and assumptions quickly &#8211; in this world, we have to.  Having a college degree sends a message about you.  Having a personal style sends a message about you.  It&#8217;s one way of branding yourself.  You don&#8217;t need to spend a lot of money, but I believe there is indeed value to thinking about what message your appearance sends to the world and making sure that aligns with what conclusions you hope they draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939730</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing I don&#039;t like about multi-author blogs is the quality of the posts tends to go down, at least on the blogs I read. I find I skip a LOT of new GRS articles because I can&#039;t stand a couple of the new writers, and the others are merely mediocre.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I don&#8217;t like about multi-author blogs is the quality of the posts tends to go down, at least on the blogs I read. I find I skip a LOT of new GRS articles because I can&#8217;t stand a couple of the new writers, and the others are merely mediocre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valleycat1</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939700</link>
		<dc:creator>valleycat1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re insurance - the idea is that your beneficiaries/dependents can support their same standard of living by using income from the principal of the insurance (i.e., the amount of insurance you&#039;re carrying).  With 2 very young children, you&#039;ll want your family to be able to do that for at least 10 years, if not 15-20. And the principal would be available to the kids for college or other post-high school studies as they go out on their own, if your wife doesn&#039;t need it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re insurance &#8211; the idea is that your beneficiaries/dependents can support their same standard of living by using income from the principal of the insurance (i.e., the amount of insurance you&#8217;re carrying).  With 2 very young children, you&#8217;ll want your family to be able to do that for at least 10 years, if not 15-20. And the principal would be available to the kids for college or other post-high school studies as they go out on their own, if your wife doesn&#8217;t need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939694</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s very appropriate you talk about how it&#039;s easy to come to know the foibles and consistent traits of certain authors and in the same post leave out the title and link for your last paragraph.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s very appropriate you talk about how it&#8217;s easy to come to know the foibles and consistent traits of certain authors and in the same post leave out the title and link for your last paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2011/02/23/the-simple-dollar-weekly-roundup-volunteer-readers-edition/#comment-939690</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesimpledollar.com/?p=6702#comment-939690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Ramsey recommends 10 times an individuals annual income. Seems to me that is a reasonable number for someone with kids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Ramsey recommends 10 times an individuals annual income. Seems to me that is a reasonable number for someone with kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
